From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5548F95BB1 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:25:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 34E412F955 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:25:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:25:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id y19so4392714edc.2 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:25:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=30ImTsYKtsX0lS+cz6b5AAexXwd0nUmj4NnQxQ7RXC0=; b=lIHUoeiYUdaITZIQMx0e1ji6HC/zLjPUiNFr15Pm0hJN1AiZlj3KvfUD4O8bkHfe1P YpXvrRL3r9Wmvg4AVs8HGPfkKEE0RoqXrWflR+WCU7jtgpuurvfQEObaW+Fi6IwhbavR TXb0/0wtVCkw8gpgeH0xOq2AhTDxm2tVmR4Mc1Qd0Q7GopTYNj5T0lqnZGBZVgQyezam u0EoUZzqxKaA5Q14waAe2CXD6bTwGP6aTIhZ44FWewzA3SephunQbHJS4qbeAXOL6/WF dgRgC89bnLxyw7lKpr7rITxWqt6cokVtOi8WZ73IsQTquQ0wm7m7XU4iPuuogkPtaJdq ZRiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=30ImTsYKtsX0lS+cz6b5AAexXwd0nUmj4NnQxQ7RXC0=; b=062FfpJrvwszRBKJBkB893pVVJBAB3uXpIfSH0hl10HhdyrUnXxaWF9EOnAdTrgzBA h3gm4CUhxM0PGBJsVv0B3olcBJw9stfU/tADUKYOAhdzguYUxTlwVOE1ALo9hEmPVvv2 wVv3hYDXaUzWQoceEbx66IHDikVzWtss0vFy41/xiV5haIWUCunbPJwZaXzwdTN7oMKZ zj0vCDiI1MbZXwZ+8K6gB+GZJT17u9RC8fjU+6IH/73MpGjH81pnHxi3PjYGAYHeHXt2 k9LraQJgz6rhIsi6c5Uhfh/49h+SV1MxBgD+vsfvxmp4FRbHdmCgJ2wuj13mxTtP8RD5 EPGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2ko/RbAoK4Zl+92zkJvRXlnG3kmnWZRyQ3cFVv6guL2WAScQ0EZ0 /ujSQ3n5AdWPkbe2bpbrNAV6zNd1C7ayIJUlcmDxYu0v X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvxjc+MkSpzoabkPRY2xJNuVT4MeaTl0RKCEf78NGdnZkHpZDdarLL8mAlQ24sN1Ha34FB5T1r7bzxiGdbOr9A= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1396:b0:49b:52b4:83ca with SMTP id b22-20020a056402139600b0049b52b483camr1291441edv.225.1674159917769; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:25:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: JR Richardson Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 14:25:06 -0600 Message-ID: To: Proxmox VE user list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.004 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [PVE-User] Proxmox Backup Server Multiple Clusters X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 20:25:56 -0000 Hey Folks, Using the PBS, any concerns having multiple networks accessing multiple Cluster Segments? I think I would separate data stores for each Cluster, I'm more concerned with performance. Any thoughts on the matter, OK or not recommended? Thanks. JR