From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017AA608DD for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:20:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EA10814D5A for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:20:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.17.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id DBBC414D45 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:20:05 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1606411205; bh=zQFh+594lUWmBb/4W1e9Wtmz221/8XcxCkKUW3YCmmM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Pa+ruHa6M8tmpv0fD2g5MWphiPtvLms9YUdE/RLmZtSSHR0S21NwgHRiay2E6KTsH rq+rFM2eDuixzKG3/4pczYGpcgmqMcUiz8Sci/QYedKuUQ9jR5GUpTOn7eWcARb7/p 0GfL7d/QwInd+WYFNrGl3S0ukl+vEjxlITnhBVCA= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from [192.168.51.91] ([91.4.25.202]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1oGM-1kNmyb0n8M-00tnfm for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:07:11 +0100 To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <7f76f464-825e-41c7-ca3f-ca86d1be0c76@proxmox.com> From: Peter Simon Message-ID: <9fd80d46-3e12-0513-5e76-1a65980bfb28@web.de> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:07:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:tshO/lmTwZ3uqGTfiF0So0q7p0nsI/tpxyDZKkM8Jc49eRFfe4W W64bbXQBMNEaiduXhtA3tgHl1VK0WxCXtN57TErPprC5tJixKydgqDm4N0dFeVS/7UONJ4I gdVEQRT67/ndmZD73UrR7JWPuvIAytyZ0V7byxCyzZ5g4AbkMj069VefFb4TFAEFuFtw1DN Pxi5fG4YvNtEfJHCDBSLA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qJABuD0Y9Qw=:kCbahLVKMMAIyy2YvUF5X6 gJqtubsv9B2vJ0E6B8Xp48crwDrbliX6CyxV/RnvDxuU8jepBDZv7/k9gnPUdhytNPg1Z/+BC L3yM6o4J+ORtyu3tXu+h/6RZAWsLpi2gDbGSWXBK4S5ib1hvahkyMD/LsqYbqwEdx0p1lStJA tIa6N0MHSL4ObQyWpbqVool1l0w5JHgCQ54CQPGMJH/vXVk06sD7ZvTDXihX68BJrPkIfvbw8 YyvUpMI6WLF/bbglQtLVUHDtKfKx2F0JTOgB2Tk3E1YPC9K1NeuzHxGZW/F3Vh5WEcCqfDLp7 aoyTDyBkVVUXdfX1IuMtFQD4ndMw2FK3gBfST9Sh/+0G1ng6tSO9o7okpC6Kw7BevtkYo66Jd cQ4BieKgYFPNyXF+DtAc0jEFHgAGIY0SHUWKjLJoFauvXFKNvHN8Ka63yxCMtVpDg8HAyFRva 6dYdQW9aBkV/wXKc3thXNdinWVsuvjmg3jBunwZ/QyR0fDgjxa/5MSbLiegU7G0XKE4F1lzNu cU0lzK6b+6TZbrVBUk8yIdj0ifK5eMtyfVJ2MeEgAPqCIQETuT21kKlpQScOqCkvL1XGsGsF+ Ku56Nu9TrY3tNuyemDT+UYzynhFghJSg023U1bv16x88NKryXkvBfulaIL++tsnRbl+RTjZTz q6exaIbM6mnbfROLtpa4LlvYi1igp6cubqwYF93s5LzBWlZu+5u0EDO/2dkwenTZveNYextjc JPPMc2XXdeit7nqyiDcC2EaK6IqGqVxRxcsvtwypoCIr99eCUaNdl0q0fC+kCj7fN7pS+Elio TbbcC4knPKph3eScNvupOsDzc+lGuh8pXO9/lLkD3JD3s5paxGT1zdQ1BtvL0Gg357N6WryJ7 NMY0WCRoJRI/C/krf+GQ== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 6.3 available X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:20:07 -0000 Am 26.11.20 um 17:40 schrieb Alejandro Bonilla via pve-user: > Is there any documentation on upgrading from N to O? Do I just modify https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Ceph_Nautilus_to_Octopus > > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph.list > debhttp://download.proxmox.com/debian/ceph-luminous buster main > > To > > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph.list > debhttp://download.proxmox.com/debian/ceph-octopus buster main * Note*: It is*not*possible to upgrade from Ceph Luminous to Octopus directly. > > I=92m guessing the version selector is for a first-time configuration wi= zard. > > Besides waiting on the above, my upgrade to 6.3-2 was uneventful. > > Thanks for a great release. so you missed the step Nautilus ... Cheers Peter