From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 831658FA2 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2023 02:20:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 680901A308 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2023 02:19:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2023 02:19:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-68becf931d0so2120168b3a.3 for ; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 17:19:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693613985; x=1694218785; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=in-reply-to:from:references:to:content-language:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=D8TlWPlm+GbATgSr1Aedxij0IeifjGL7ZRdPCa9Y0RI=; b=fc5eY21FRylK0aG10jfFUMa5WKPpIve4YzSA52GwKbGzY5a0A5IAjw5xeUvthMcuRE IS2DL8M8voM0aRz+PdD55/gpPSQVbQJzTs3HP/FKvzHQpQuvSqfs34gXUYU20AfZ4ktv BGZromYU2fxCT0PsEu4oW3zZHEaN58kCppSsg1Pnt3CWeF7aNRbbllOevVUcBHnhGjcY EwB6RalQtAAM2fWLH3UBzPcqre5pw/Z2uRBgnV50lF5YWIWCR3RHKjfjnEqXBEIrmdCH LWnwkttvfqk/kz0rRjPcir5voE+0v/mRGWK2oDlFn5zKgrMy0cJI6dYQtcOcMfQNb73P NlWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693613985; x=1694218785; h=in-reply-to:from:references:to:content-language:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=D8TlWPlm+GbATgSr1Aedxij0IeifjGL7ZRdPCa9Y0RI=; b=CRJJN2O5sGR6H9Ye6K/3vuLhcgK38WycC1L6cbJCgnQtXerwScFOiR+iok6lfVN5Hp 1owSMudCySo2N6Lyt6sFaqO6GED4Ey/VAbR3az1sk4ARCA/UZmnlqpHcgcwBRzNqdezK 3gLrMJT3wIudHWBx2B/O3+dg7WzKZPIQWEGmu8f9nH4kv1/+UsKB6EGfGIUoJlXVy25G 0uSsYnvFesgo/BzliZWN9xYoPu1KcYC/rwj3EGDeyYh8y6B9V2Dzu9S+CEn+fYUQ0svd kgU2GnXIKcfxPuwikv73Q7cSdB+yHYhBb2+UZX1EGUeY21c9NlVfvdyTBuMrzCU90olv S/Gg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz+6Lh7CMSxIqlPd5DTYhfbBkyg/8rZK7E6TSQGLQxU8ALDYRVG O6JR5rucPRlfvvjaA5mMOKnEIia0Nsg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFW9dS3xzs75p02KVpacruw511cTosA2jIM/1C1bgy7ZQICtgksJ17czOcjJZqESWEX1cllpA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2ea0:b0:68b:f7b9:d9c8 with SMTP id fd32-20020a056a002ea000b0068bf7b9d9c8mr4540306pfb.11.1693613984401; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 17:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n21-20020aa79055000000b0068a53ac9d46sm3460189pfo.100.2023.09.01.17.19.42 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Sep 2023 17:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e26701a-8044-dab7-5252-d0c409c3dc87@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 10:19:38 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0 Content-Language: en-US To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: From: Lindsay Mathieson In-Reply-To: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 2.459 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message NICE_REPLY_A -3.478 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] USB Expansion Card for PCIE Hub passthrough? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2023 00:20:25 -0000 Thanks everyone for the useful info. nb. I did try passing through my Motherboard USB as its not used by the proxmox install, but that was a disaster. Shares IOMMU groups with the disk controller... On 31/08/2023 3:40 pm, Arjen via pve-user wrote: > Some GPUs have USB and often you can passthrough an internal USB controller that > is provided by the CPU. Those usually work with passthrough. None on mine (GTX 1070) unfortunately  :) > Please search the internet/forums for a USB controller that is known to work with passthrough. > Many cheap devices use a USB-chip that does not reset properly. Sometimes manufacturers change > the chip without warning for a cheaper one. Level1techs forum might help: > https://forum.level1techs.com/t/jacks-hardware-the-ultimate-vfio-usb-3-0-controller/135926 Thanks! >> Currently looking at a Orico 7 Port USB 3.0 PCIe Dual Chip Card. >> > Sorry, but I have no experience with that one. Check what chip it uses internally. Yeah, thats the trouble with the cheap and cheerfuls, getting solid info on the chipsets is a minefield. > Best of luck on your hunt for the right USB controller. Thanks! I'll post here if I find anything. -- Lindsay Mathieson