From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lindsay.mathieson@gmail.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 831658FA2
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat,  2 Sep 2023 02:20:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 680901A308
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat,  2 Sep 2023 02:19:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat,  2 Sep 2023 02:19:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id
 d2e1a72fcca58-68becf931d0so2120168b3a.3
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 17:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693613985; x=1694218785; darn=lists.proxmox.com;
 h=in-reply-to:from:references:to:content-language:subject:user-agent
 :mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
 :reply-to; bh=D8TlWPlm+GbATgSr1Aedxij0IeifjGL7ZRdPCa9Y0RI=;
 b=fc5eY21FRylK0aG10jfFUMa5WKPpIve4YzSA52GwKbGzY5a0A5IAjw5xeUvthMcuRE
 IS2DL8M8voM0aRz+PdD55/gpPSQVbQJzTs3HP/FKvzHQpQuvSqfs34gXUYU20AfZ4ktv
 BGZromYU2fxCT0PsEu4oW3zZHEaN58kCppSsg1Pnt3CWeF7aNRbbllOevVUcBHnhGjcY
 EwB6RalQtAAM2fWLH3UBzPcqre5pw/Z2uRBgnV50lF5YWIWCR3RHKjfjnEqXBEIrmdCH
 LWnwkttvfqk/kz0rRjPcir5voE+0v/mRGWK2oDlFn5zKgrMy0cJI6dYQtcOcMfQNb73P
 NlWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693613985; x=1694218785;
 h=in-reply-to:from:references:to:content-language:subject:user-agent
 :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject
 :date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=D8TlWPlm+GbATgSr1Aedxij0IeifjGL7ZRdPCa9Y0RI=;
 b=CRJJN2O5sGR6H9Ye6K/3vuLhcgK38WycC1L6cbJCgnQtXerwScFOiR+iok6lfVN5Hp
 1owSMudCySo2N6Lyt6sFaqO6GED4Ey/VAbR3az1sk4ARCA/UZmnlqpHcgcwBRzNqdezK
 3gLrMJT3wIudHWBx2B/O3+dg7WzKZPIQWEGmu8f9nH4kv1/+UsKB6EGfGIUoJlXVy25G
 0uSsYnvFesgo/BzliZWN9xYoPu1KcYC/rwj3EGDeyYh8y6B9V2Dzu9S+CEn+fYUQ0svd
 kgU2GnXIKcfxPuwikv73Q7cSdB+yHYhBb2+UZX1EGUeY21c9NlVfvdyTBuMrzCU90olv
 S/Gg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz+6Lh7CMSxIqlPd5DTYhfbBkyg/8rZK7E6TSQGLQxU8ALDYRVG
 O6JR5rucPRlfvvjaA5mMOKnEIia0Nsg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFW9dS3xzs75p02KVpacruw511cTosA2jIM/1C1bgy7ZQICtgksJ17czOcjJZqESWEX1cllpA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2ea0:b0:68b:f7b9:d9c8 with SMTP id
 fd32-20020a056a002ea000b0068bf7b9d9c8mr4540306pfb.11.1693613984401; 
 Fri, 01 Sep 2023 17:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.160] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net.
 [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 n21-20020aa79055000000b0068a53ac9d46sm3460189pfo.100.2023.09.01.17.19.42
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 01 Sep 2023 17:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9e26701a-8044-dab7-5252-d0c409c3dc87@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 10:19:38 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.14.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <db01d069-1c6c-8294-1f62-f0756305a310@gmail.com>
 <mailman.13.1693461098.312.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
From: Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.13.1693461098.312.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 2.459 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain DMARC_PASS               -0.1 DMARC pass policy
 FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 HTML_MESSAGE            0.001 HTML included in message
 NICE_REPLY_A           -3.478 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 no trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] USB Expansion Card for PCIE Hub passthrough?
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2023 00:20:25 -0000

Thanks everyone for the useful info.

nb. I did try passing through my Motherboard USB as its not used by the 
proxmox install, but that was a disaster. Shares IOMMU groups with the 
disk controller...

On 31/08/2023 3:40 pm, Arjen via pve-user wrote:
> Some GPUs have USB and often you can passthrough an internal USB controller that
> is provided by the CPU. Those usually work with passthrough.

None on mine (GTX 1070) unfortunately  :)

> Please search the internet/forums for a USB controller that is known to work with passthrough.
> Many cheap devices use a USB-chip that does not reset properly.  Sometimes manufacturers change
> the chip without warning for a cheaper one. Level1techs forum might help:
> https://forum.level1techs.com/t/jacks-hardware-the-ultimate-vfio-usb-3-0-controller/135926


Thanks!

>> Currently looking at a Orico 7 Port USB 3.0 PCIe Dual Chip Card.
>>
> Sorry, but I have no experience with that one. Check what chip it uses internally.

Yeah, thats the trouble with the cheap and cheerfuls, getting solid info 
on the chipsets is a minefield.

> Best of luck on your hunt for the right USB controller.


Thanks! I'll post here if I find anything.

-- 

Lindsay Mathieson