From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55D3E1FF165
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 May 2025 15:23:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CF27235F11;
	Thu, 22 May 2025 15:23:28 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <9aed076a-0e2e-46b9-9ee3-2e6d9abdf651@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 15:23:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
References: <m24ixgm5uj.wl-randy@psg.com>
 <8fa284b2-11b6-4136-82df-cc81a1976213@proxmox.com>
 <m2o6vnkxjq.wl-randy@psg.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2o6vnkxjq.wl-randy@psg.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] zfs raidz2 expansion
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-user" <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>



On  2025-05-20  19:21, Randy Bush wrote:
> ok, makes sense.  thanks.  as this is production, we probably would not
> want to be early adopters of zfs 2.3 anyway.
> 
> so, can i specify a second pool to be replication target, as i suggested
> in
> 
>>> as we do full replication, we could just create a new pool for
>>> replocation and call it a day.
> 
> i do not see an attribute for relocation pool in storage.cfg

Where does the quote here come from? Did I miss an email in this thread?

> 
> randy
> 



_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user