From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07AB2637BD for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:18:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F0901940B for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:18:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 58C6192C6 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:18:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0C364454AF; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:18:57 +0200 (CEST) To: Proxmox VE user list , "Bertorello, Marco" , chris@itg.uy References: <0eca6cfc-96c5-ab78-1dea-0e2dc2f043b7@marcobertorello.it> From: Thomas Lamprecht Message-ID: <989e0a2e-50f1-8e15-0378-b6b488dd45f8@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:18:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:81.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/81.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0eca6cfc-96c5-ab78-1dea-0e2dc2f043b7@marcobertorello.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.183 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [dart.dev, proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] New Mobile App X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:18:59 -0000 On 22.09.20 16:18, Bertorello, Marco wrote: > Hi PVE users, great news: >=20 > https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/new-mobile-app-for-proxmox-ve.76317/ >=20 > Unfortunately, I cannot test this app because my servers are behind a > reverse proxy running on standard 443/HTTPS port, while for the app > https and :8006 are implied. >=20 > I hope this will change in future, the app seems very cool! OK, I checked it. While in general other ports than 8006 work just fine, there's a bug with the https 443 one. The reason for this is that the dart Uri.hasPort[0] property is queried when checking if the passed URL has no port added and thus the implied 8006 port should be added[1]. For https and port 443 the port is detected= as "default" and omitted, thus this is always false for that, argh! So, if I do a reverse proxy on port 444 it works, on 444 not. We'll fix this with the next release. cheers, Thomas [0]: https://api.dart.dev/stable/2.9.1/dart-core/Uri/hasPort.html [1]: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=3Dflutter/proxmox_login_manager.git;a=3Db= lob;f=3Dlib/proxmox_login_form.dart;h=3D2a4f5011279944ca508aeb69ed11f5d3d= 6a4ae36;hb=3DHEAD#l470