From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B692C6617F for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:25:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A909FCC6B for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:25:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx-ext.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de (mx-ext.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de [192.54.49.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id F3C67CC5F for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:25:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned-DKFZ: amavisd-new at dkfz-heidelberg.de Received: from w610-mb05.local (dkfz-vpn116.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de [194.94.115.116]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx-ext.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/smtpin) with ESMTP id 105JP1F0003939 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:25:03 +0100 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx-ext.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de 105JP1F0003939 To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <21dec802-c6e8-d395-1444-7b30df5620cd@dkfz-heidelberg.de> <255b8af8-8834-0f24-d9a6-819f2d2cf8c8@dkfz-heidelberg.de> From: Frank Thommen Organization: DKFZ Heidelberg, Omics IT and Data Management Core Facility (ODCF) Message-ID: <9811d98a-ebf2-8590-ddd0-3b707ede4a4e@dkfz-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:24:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mx-ext.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de [192.54.49.101]); Tue, 05 Jan 2021 20:25:04 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NICE_REPLY_A, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mx-ext.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.145 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com, ceph.target] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] After update Ceph monitor shows wrong version in UI and is down and out of quorum X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 19:25:07 -0000 Hi Uwe, > did you look into the log of MON and OSD? I can't see any specific MON and OSD logs. However the log available in the UI (Ceph -> Log) has lots of messages regarding scrubbing but no messages regarding issues with starting the monitor > Can you provide the list of > installed packages of the affected host and the rest of the cluster? let me compile the lists and post them somewhere. They are quite long. > > Is the output of "ceph status" the same for all hosts? yes Frank > > > Regards, > >     Uwe > > Am 05.01.21 um 20:01 schrieb Frank Thommen: >> >> On 04.01.21 12:44, Frank Thommen wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> one of our three PVE hypervisors in the cluster crashed (it was >>> fenced successfully) and rebooted automatically.  I took the chance >>> to do a complete dist-upgrade and rebooted again. >>> >>> The PVE Ceph dashboard now reports, that >>> >>>    * the monitor on the host is down (out of quorum), and >>>    * "A newer version was installed but old version still running, >>> please restart" >>> >>> The Ceph UI reports monitor version 14.2.11 while in fact 14.2.16 is >>> installed. The hypervisor has been rebooted twice since the upgrade, >>> so it should be basically impossible that the old version is still >>> running. >>> >>> `systemctl restart ceph.target` and restarting the monitor through >>> the PVE Ceph UI didn't help. The hypervisor is running PVE 6.3-3 (the >>> other two are running 6.3-2 with monitor 14.2.15) >>> >>> What to do in this situation? >>> >>> I am happy with either UI or commandline instructions, but I have no >>> Ceph experience besides setting up it up following the PVE instructions. >>> >>> Any help or hint is appreciated. >>> Cheers, Frank >> >> In an attempt to fix the issue I destroyed the monitor through the UI >> and recreated it.  Unfortunately it can still not be started.  A popup >> tells me that the monitor has been started, but the overview still >> shows "stopped" and there is no version number any more. >> >> Then I stopped and started Ceph on the node (`pveceph stop; pveceph >> start`) which resulted in a degraded cluster (1 host down, 7 of 21 >> OSDs down). OSDs cannot be started through the UI either. >> >> I feel extremely uncomfortable with this situation and would >> appreciate any hint as to how I should proceed with the problem. >> >> Cheers, Frank >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user