From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 120AD601D5 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:55:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 009DA2C04F for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:55:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pmg.fws.fr (pmg.fws.fr [51.91.175.36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id BEAF22C044 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:55:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pmg.fws.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg.fws.fr (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 87CFCC27C8 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:55:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zmproxy.fws.fr (zmproxy.fws.fr [10.29.1.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pmg.fws.fr (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 4B452C1575 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:55:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zmproxy.fws.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmproxy.fws.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 465908B79BF for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:55:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zmproxy.fws.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmproxy.fws.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E8AD8B79C0 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:55:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zmproxy.fws.fr 2E8AD8B79C0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=firewall-services.com; s=7DAD15A2-D84A-11E9-8F77-BEC4FAA34EBC; t=1602057326; bh=o4Rr1B2uwJSLIRv9M4st41PmeiFUAI4HOVqgaPv+Vkw=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=0D2GdXNBbpIEj/vIkB+JJ3LIITlaBdepYeOvEhpVU3g/pQus93c8nvk9sQIkf7lZC CkNeO0n0TkZl/G8Ay3f/6sGdTJP/qm/4VrbeNctbg293fCsX+KWFBKzDEpOgAFsUgj HnRlCFtmtjGA0Ub5TXTTUX5AAYH7P0A6hd2jyzab6nQ/Q5rwSCD2xenIhmL4G0yahr HUoQhcKSIerqL+ouFI/WYRDjeQ4nc60LTy/2xU4JnjYmgBPCWkACwzwDzgiFlOje66 750o5WKVelvWiT1hkxmMrOS9pCJLhXmUBFq1LHanhdqF7+88E5XEUINwfWIQ+bbPol uKYfR/HEf1mWA== Received: from zmstore.fws.fr (zmstore.fws.fr [10.29.3.15]) by zmproxy.fws.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DA18B79BF for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:55:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:55:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Daniel Berteaud To: Proxmox VE user list Message-ID: <970746267.205741.1602057326034.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr> In-Reply-To: References: <1550328837.203739.1601999955107.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr> <497035042.203793.1602001437004.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.29.1.17] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_3963 (ZimbraWebClient - GC85 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_3963) Thread-Topic: QEMU failing to start from the web with ZFS Over iSCSI Thread-Index: YNcoNVj0xuPOHvdNIO68CrY5h48UWw== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.017 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [firewall-services.com, fws.fr] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] QEMU failing to start from the web with ZFS Over iSCSI X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 07:55:59 -0000 ----- Le 7 Oct 20, =C3=A0 8:20, Dominik Csapak d.csapak@proxmox.com a =C3= =A9crit : >=20 > is there anything else in the task log of the start? ( you can obtain > that by dobuble clicking the task) Nop, nothing else >=20 > also maybe there are some hints in the pve log during that time? Nothing relevant. Syslog just show : Oct 06 16:15:00 pvo1 pvedaemon[15956]: start failed: QEMU exited with code = -1 Oct 06 16:15:00 pvo1 pvedaemon[14869]: end task UPID:pvo1:00003E= 54:029AB217:5F7C7BE3:qmstart:149:dani@pam: start failed: QEMU exited with c= ode -1 And the task log in /var/log/pve/tasks just TASK ERROR: start failed: QEMU exited with code -1 >=20 > basically 'qm start ID' does the same think as the API so > there should be no difference I agree, that's why I do not understand what's going on >=20 > can you post your vm config? (qm config ID) Here's one exmple : agent: 1 audio0: device=3Dich9-intel-hda,driver=3Dspice balloon: 3072 bootdisk: scsi0 cores: 4 cpu: Skylake-Client cpuunits: 512 ide0: none,media=3Dcdrom memory: 4096 name: win10-test.fws.fr net0: virtio=3D32:8B:E2:AD:90:03,bridge=3Dtests numa: 0 ostype: win10 scsi0: iscsi-zfs-zol1-prd:vm-115-disk-0,discard=3Don,size=3D33G,ssd=3D1 scsihw: virtio-scsi-pci smbios1: uuid=3Dfb7d5364-6cfa-46f7-8866-4dedb3427605 sockets: 1 usb0: spice vga: qxl (changing other settings, like discard, CPU model, SPICE vs VNC etc has no = effect) And my storage : zfs: iscsi-zfs-zol1-prd blocksize 16k iscsiprovider LIO pool pool/pve/prod portal 10.29.255.252 target iqn.2019-10.fr.fws.pve:prod content images lio_tpg tpg1 nowritecache 1 sparse 1 Cheers, Daniel --=20 [ https://www.firewall-services.com/ ] =09 Daniel Berteaud=20 FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS, La s=C3=A9curit=C3=A9 des r=C3=A9seaux=20 Soci=C3=A9t=C3=A9 de Services en Logiciels Libres=20 T=C3=A9l : +33.5 56 64 15 32=20 Matrix: @dani:fws.fr=20 [ https://www.firewall-services.com/ | https://www.firewall-services.com ]