From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02F5D60A1C for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 20:55:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E6F5815AEB for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 20:55:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 538F315ADC for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 20:55:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id o9so4510659ejg.1 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:55:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+TYCvqNmmRFC+N5TYP/mJ28LLzNYL0SQZb8lo0OhLsc=; b=I0mY2E6GZFaQesqHt0UPVpyNNNC72Y2CHM4HFbX5O6bfls/cCyeuyjAT7KZ8iHwq6m j+F22+BR7Gn0vIWWplfyCBDIzonVEU0xmAMQHQ/rIjcyaGaP5ap0BMwE0pCO3yZvPA/D 3EiIoNLI94AwHRc3dMe1+4X/n6o63D8HBJ1tkx1XRC8lUJKy+jqDr1Y+u0pI5J6ZPVua Ln2X943L0tLFrzwU5AdETskpU8blEDLuXm1C3IkUdsNpQqThyp5uP99QuekBbwwkq4qb 6/M/SQ25sves34Jqcj6JnoxsPy27zy8LwO+b7YVhQNlYSi/zWRLdf7WhaLdlZsAFWswI S+Xg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+TYCvqNmmRFC+N5TYP/mJ28LLzNYL0SQZb8lo0OhLsc=; b=a5rYaOd/xC8PIidQk5jd2hH+adDdSA0mc9ztTGc65hzc9OWZ3JHBV2Xnea9qFyUHcN VgEmRsdE2xfQAB25NkGr3uY3jPLrMeXBALlOc40U9d1PMfsVlkXAS8kSHvYW0fqiH5to oWROXOmiL8A5lEj9rFl1yA16DAaxgq6QtwV0CZAvk5ZBFWSsl6j6GWkH6Ht7WuG6HIcG 1x+uuOpXT2/KehItofbb1fQctBck1ThQnwsRwiW7BSVQXqlgD7IkezeDINq9EJWNUEun HhPNa2nf048LgkKlvTJmPWpRTCUg4OyJEgEvNnx390Ob+7mSTOfB8BiUPnPGuZ7MBNM8 am5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53353t/ppfwfXvehuECUQbvqJ2nd7fSyEADFJQU/nC5uRfjEYbed rfRAdllpqMI0zmVWyKF+aBM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbO+8HYlgRexUm5/eww9D1Pfp53c3dCtDC+HW3vkL7aWSp3EHzQeh3b9G2iPaDlWgT07n6vA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:13d2:: with SMTP id g18mr4222579ejc.76.1606420501033; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:55:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8070:a3c0:1400:9423:3717:33a2:23fe? ([2a02:8070:a3c0:1400:9423:3717:33a2:23fe]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m26sm3647968ejb.45.2020.11.26.11.55.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:55:00 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE user list References: <4545c7f5-9b50-2f0a-952a-cc532ad01b13@gmail.com> <32d89f84-29a7-90c4-deed-1a3638c99098@proxmox.com> From: Uwe Sauter Message-ID: <961e6e45-6345-793d-74e2-e16db96a4a70@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 20:54:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <32d89f84-29a7-90c4-deed-1a3638c99098@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] [update available] Re: Caution: ceph-mon service does not start after today's updates X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:55:44 -0000 Thomas, thank you and your team for that prompt response. I'll try out tomorrow first thing in the morning. Regards, Uwe Am 26.11.20 um 20:35 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: > Hi all, > Hi Uwe and Lindsay, > > ceph 14.2.15-pve2 is now available, it includes fixes for the ordering > restraints of the various ceph service unit files[0], besides that there > where zero actual code changes. > > Due to that and Stoiko's tests (much thanks for all the help!) confirming > the positive result of mine, we uploaded it for general availability. > > Thanks also to you two for reporting! > > regards, > Thomas > > [0]: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=ceph.git;a=blob;f=patches/0009-fix-service-ordering-avoid-Before-remote-fs-pre.targ.patch;h=8fe5a35c385f7d4007b4965d297fc0daa9091be3;hb=99b3812832d5d5a8ac48a2e3b084c0ecf1fd087c > >