From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nada@verdnatura.es>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C134579B60
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:50:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B8AA517A89
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:50:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ip1-isp1-algemesi.verdnatura.es
 (ip1-isp1-algemesi.verdnatura.es [195.77.191.178])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 96E0217A7B
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:50:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from webmail.verdnatura.es (swarm-worker1.static.verdnatura.es
 [10.0.2.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ip1-isp1-algemesi.verdnatura.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A1A0A0092;
 Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:41:21 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:41:21 +0200
From: nada <nada@verdnatura.es>
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.6.1635257041.15957.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <mailman.6.1635257041.15957.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.11
Message-ID: <957a4a2e946c5b2c0a6579163224521c@verdnatura.es>
X-Sender: nada@verdnatura.es
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.052 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [ceph.com]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PVE 7 Ceph 16.2.6 osd crash
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:50:29 -0000

hello Eneko
are all your ceph nodes time synced ?
PLS check chrony and drift time
# ceph time-sync-status

in case you have new spare disk and free slot, try to add new OSD and 
stabilize ceph cluster
in case you do not have free slot (and you are sure that it failed) you 
have to replace it
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/operations/add-or-rm-osds/#replacing-an-osd

before any changes identify disk and OSD status
list disk bay at server # pvs
# ceph osd tree
# ceph device ls
# ceph-volume lvm list > osd-lvm-list-202110XX

BTW we started with ceph cluster here in June, so sorry i am beginner 
with ceph
Nada