From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 537361FF183 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 22:10:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5ACB9108C4; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 22:10:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 21:48:58 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: <8qrirl-qda3.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> References: X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1759953021 684622 192.168.1.45 (8 Oct 2025 19:50:21 GMT) To: Alwin Antreich via pve-user X-Mailer: tin/2.6.4-20240224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.14.0-33-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: ; from SmartGate on Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 22:06:01PM +0200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.346 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Again (not) renaming interfaces... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" Mandi! Alwin Antreich via pve-user In chel di` si favelave... > No, that is the usual thing to do when upgrading. ;) Till PVE9 at least, the pinning tool should help you there. > https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#network_pin_naming_scheme_version ...i don't think is a naming sheme problem; if i reboot the server, probably interfaces get enumerated normally; so, this seems a transient problem. Simply happen, and if someone say me, i coud try to debug it... -- _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user