From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB8D924F7 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:17:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3D86A247A2 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:17:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out-18.di.u-psud.fr (smtp-out-18.di.u-psud.fr [129.175.213.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:17:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out-2.di.u-psud.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-2.di.u-psud.fr (UPS-MTA-OUT) with ESMTP id 4Nhr9p5wHcz2mb4; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:17:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from pmx2.di.u-psud.fr (pmx2.di.u-psud.fr [129.175.212.153]) by smtp-out-2.di.u-psud.fr (UPS-MTA-OUT) with ESMTP id 4Nhr9p5lkkzcNkm; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:17:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-in-2.di.u-psud.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (UPS-PMX) with SMTP id 4Nhr9p5bRZz1qvRf; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:17:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from [129.175.212.70] (smtps.u-psud.fr [129.175.212.70]) (UPS-MTA) (Authenticated sender: alain.pean via 192.168.71.7) with ESMTPSA id 4Nhr9p20QRz7Sr ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:17:02 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: smtps.u-psud.fr; auth=pass smtp.mailfrom=alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr Message-ID: <8f8156db-ec51-a426-3146-3fcf843b5699@c2n.upsaclay.fr> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 13:17:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Reply-To: alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr Content-Language: fr To: =?UTF-8?Q?=c3=93scar_de_Arriba?= , Proxmox VE user list References: <5b795a94-ebd3-7793-a7c3-4567cd1b04f0@c2n.upsaclay.fr> <41f85334-834c-4534-916d-39bf5e382c75@app.fastmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Alain_P=c3=a9an?= In-Reply-To: <41f85334-834c-4534-916d-39bf5e382c75@app.fastmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Nhr9p20QRz7Sr X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.944 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.147 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.001 Informational: message has unparseable relay lines Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Thin LVM showing more used space than expected X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 12:17:11 -0000 Le 28/12/2022 à 12:19, Óscar de Arriba a écrit : > I think Proxmox UI is showing the % of wearout consumed. In my case, with Dell servers, the UI in fact is not showing anything (N/A), when the Raid storage volume is managed by the raid controller. In this case, I use Dell OMSA (Open Manage Server Administration), to display the values. But I have another cluster with Ceph, and indeed, it displays 0% as wearout. So I think you are right. I saw that they are Crucial SATA SSD directly attached on the motherboard. What kind of filesystem do you have on these SSDs ? Can you run pveperf on /dev/mapper/pveroot to see what are the performances ? Alain -- Administrateur Système/Réseau C2N Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies (UMR 9001) Boulevard Thomas Gobert (ex Avenue de La Vauve), 91120 Palaiseau Tel : 01-70-27-06-88 Bureau A255