From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9010F656A7 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:11:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 82A0627F91 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:11:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.17.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 8EF7227F87 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:11:27 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1595499081; bh=MyzMfb+3mDp5JJFzykXtuSrMvQ+q7w5jPMN50urahQg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=WYuQer6EFREIKhSGi/3a6yJbpVRkOUFE2L2vR5CwW2stisq+YlWLfSv+GIjxK6Yj5 gT1st+kyQWqnOqf5Wl5NQJFwRWzSWRx2BE/JRq09srUw1ujJDA4AFcOS4PBejFk8r3 GvZyyDfGlYtLIag9x9duXTStOnACmng8tC0UEGpA= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from Rolands-MacBook-Pro.cybercon.de ([5.147.253.138]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LhNjo-1kcGk50BQu-00meH8; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:11:21 +0200 To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com, richard lucassen References: <1506136562.36294.1595313175981.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> <20200721104154.0f2188d06a622942fddb7cab@lucassen.org> <20200723102253.b991fc7e31f4e92f54a87500@lucassen.org> From: Roland Message-ID: <8e14f866-ef7a-e7d3-1bb1-36a10ea4f9cb@web.de> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:11:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200723102253.b991fc7e31f4e92f54a87500@lucassen.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:L1XJs6bt3RTwSPytbMoqB6GcxbVRPToGpbeiRcJfDstOhLcRd/C F5UKwFFA4afKSCHg2nLNEBqJKlOjBI34aonxAjXUR8McauZQwKJ/q3BoP6cwpXkyD12VbOb AWXfkpAOlVp1TqOzNzfdsOho74RKxXEeuf7MtfeoX/ESDXEcl/dR/nSfPv7icbjgNaEJQGc FoLl7KKD2YyFdDQIsDYyA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:KSOfuNDAhdc=:FgO2Kpp4PQo25tEUoU8E2s YxZ4+zz0mkYO7XMWIGCZ3uZ6bV/lYY2gTrQ3Sev6ElneIiMKtaN+3bO4kTkasRY5Wj8JjZZzo WpQVItLxf3ad5Up0NDRIjTZSY+yPHjyR9AWkftr63xVCsupQx944nBYH9Nf3aLhvFpY6Entbn w/vh7utNyPBEiAn0Zzh9vTIoe7qD/BvC6M+37Zu0HA7Nc6tKVRMxQY6N6PkFCtjpAXEOEkyd1 YMBGFjD3Ii9cwhobPyactSaSE8+jO3Nt4DIwevK3mFce9KsORYD7/e5GPfduSb2wZ0sRu+xt3 sl/rnkWdTu/efalq8HIVSj4X1VYT9E9ebuKips+53DC6ZL9pSwGIR3sCRQqgvhMed0RFHtUrL Ch6Mz7cFW0132noKHbtno8pph2keRIM6U84yfGLBUMcci1CoJ5J80oMYGOR5PyuOchpcnji1/ tG76zmGMqvjDERUTH3xf0pjbgPxqtHzdTyncYDt/X77QW+ewzRtQ0kcdzQM2aEjFLlRzmIq7B EriVcqVzy7st4S6MJDKyDwBmG1kzylRIeZmYI4pQ43KRbapzqyI40OUfH9ZOELGqHS5/4cnrD aQ4onKQWIA43wf1nAPgvkjlsLPBrp3EiM3OLk7sOZmXuD5+RmnrD6mdgEqRErT2L/i/O8d05S tOAuPBwkzMo7EB6PMBhRNB6mkizNVURDedGg7CM8vYZjHhxgRXAnKvFOVB1eHZJJaXhBNpizI qRde2dASRdyqF7guiRFtcQB4+XU99vzwjJIw9tXjoM7s3l0840KbBF3h26RS5S37ztiqQASEM R6Oq4h0qcHYx2J9q61cdSDKOwwWh+dAKNURQqvRkYfN/r7xa276hlkUeJFK+geMupcNpnpYBK iUt4aAlQwSjW3LDmZX/Y0dSdtxrGTq9KomzYHkZNqdKAVEWv4bidmU/c9WFM7OcOewDLgpwqY sauIdoGZEaApe2PXfgChTMkgYyYfuwpdZ7I5nJjqZhUBF9aLqn4BSbBm9lWN3xM/EfYhXINKg u4FNqgV/i+RAJcmpULXlVJhVFsw7Jt/jPyG6b1KDHVcj8yVmF1OHeiDQZ83+0RdhLQCob17TF BvW7FLKDtIS+m95+VubhFZV4OnORwiXeJBBm7+RFPPf2PHQfiWe54lW/2HpCwm7yxp8Bo7k0P fzHMu4twaOaP/et9aFrbsxl7zv1vOtovudtqGCm57W++QsLDynFk4zODrTtadGpwOLkFEjZNn 2WVsFlm58H+y9mlMk X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.965 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -1.703 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Problem with Centos 5.X virtio ethernet drivers and last PVE updates X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:11:28 -0000 i see that my centos 5.11 VM should have support for virtio (see below) and according to https://access.redhat.com/articles/2488201 rhel/centos supports this since 5.3. so if virtio worked before a proxmox update,=C2=A0 then i would call this = a regression. can you tell which proxmox version worked for you with virtio ? i tested centos 5.11 installer on my older pve 6.0-4 (5.0.15-1-pve kernel) , but it does not find virtual disks. roland [root@hr-neu ~]# uname -aLinux hr-neu 2.6.18-398.el5 #1 SMP Tue Sep 16 20:50:52 EDT 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@centos5 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.11 (Final) [root@centos5 ~]# rpm -q kernel --changelog|grep virtio|grep 446214 - [xen] virtio: include headers in kernel-headers package (Eduardo Pereira Habkost ) [446214] - [xen] virtio: add PV network and block drivers for KVM (Mark McLoughlin ) [446214] - [xen] virtio: include headers in kernel-headers package (Eduardo Pereira Habkost ) [446214] - [xen] virtio: add PV network and block drivers for KVM (Mark McLoughlin ) [446214] Am 23.07.20 um 10:22 schrieb richard lucassen: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 11:06:27 +0200 > Michael Rasmussen via pve-user wrote: > >> On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:41:54 +0200 >> richard lucassen wrote: >> >>> network. There is definitly something wrong somewhere. >>> >> The only thing wrong here is that you a running a version of >> RHEL/CentOS which is in maintenance support 2. This means there will >> be no more updates except critical bugs. As of March 31, 2017 it is >> considered in deep freeze! > I know. But sometimes you need to keep an old version and a good way to > handle this is to run such an old version in a virtual environment. > A vhost supplies virtual hardware and apparently this virtual hardware > has changed. This is not A Good Thing IMHO. > > It runs well under subversion 27 of the pve kernel but has stopped > under version 30. So I think this is a bug as I do not expect design > changes between subversion 27 and 30. > > R. >