From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9C3995E7 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:41:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 360253A06 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:41:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:41:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 51206449D8; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:41:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan Lendl To: Fabrizio Cuseo , Proxmox VE user list , pve-user In-Reply-To: <1200893807.110513.1696964512431.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> References: <1200893807.110513.1696964512431.JavaMail.zimbra@zimbra.panservice.it> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:41:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87jzrtip2a.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.067 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] qm remote-migrate X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 07:41:22 -0000 Fabrizio Cuseo writes: Hello Fabrizio, To better understand your issue, the source cluster has a VM with a bridge with a VLAN tag assigned and the target cluster does not have the same setup but uses SDN (vnet) without vlan. After migration you manually changed the VMs configuration to match the new setup? What SDN configuration are you using on the traget cluster? Please send the output of the following: head -n -1 /etc/pve/sdn/*.cfg What was to exact command you ran to start the remote-migrate process? Did you notice any suspicios log messages in the source clusters journal? Usually I would ask you to send me the entire journal but this is not feasible on the mailing list. If necessary, I would recommend you open a Thread in our community forum and I will take a look there. https://forum.proxmox.com/ Best regards, Stefan Lendl > Hello. > I am testing qm remote-migrate with 2 pve 8.0.4 clusters. > Source cluster has one bridge with vlan id on every VM, destination cluster uses SDN and a different bridge (vnet) without vlanid. > If I migrate the vm, i need to specify both bridge and vlan-id, but I have not found an option to do it. > > PS: after migration, on the new cluster the vm is running without any problem, but on source cluster remains locked and in migration, so I need to issue a "qm unlock vmid" and stop/delete it. > > I know that is an experimental feature, so I send my test results. > > Regards, Fabrizio > > > -- > --- > Fabrizio Cuseo - mailto:f.cuseo@panservice.it > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user