From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C5360189
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:18:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AC0C98F58
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:18:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 11DDC8F2F
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:18:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CBCDE41BA1;
 Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:18:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>,
 "Bertorello, Marco" <me@marcobertorello.it>, chris@itg.uy
Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <0eca6cfc-96c5-ab78-1dea-0e2dc2f043b7@marcobertorello.it>
 <989e0a2e-50f1-8e15-0378-b6b488dd45f8@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <8510ceb5-cacc-fd02-eca4-430d480bbaf4@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:18:04 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:81.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/81.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <989e0a2e-50f1-8e15-0378-b6b488dd45f8@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.178 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] New Mobile App
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:18:38 -0000

FYI: the next release (1.0.1) is out and should be available as update.
The 443 port works now too, all other ports should naturally continue to =
work.

cheers,
Thomas