From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11DBE80BE2 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:11:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EC2972AAFD for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:11:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E76012AAEF for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:11:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id gx15-20020a17090b124f00b001a695f3734aso8837832pjb.0 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 05:11:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xPzJ6RWGoS68SghW7tn4cJYuVSMH4dBCFZHnn+nVoWU=; b=WJtgPViYbGJ3cedI6nxhzGtJki2uL1YVJjnLHhJ7+4zEssa+ym0NCvjBc1XrrO2lvm GntcTjbfLPqHYfOT+bERbyu1Vx802rC7sXKrL0dYZGzIRhr0zIRBNAVvhxJcBCyMh66D B0wZyM565KoRbT2cEr4fCQQh8PmnX4/BEf5qhDLQo9he1eCD2Gx4IqVV97TJwepXWTBw DPjJ4i7hpv7SWyhBJVrWpoiSeTTSTg0d8RID5MX1ZF7htF5DF7bqAWTy1qmJviNbk/kz /bCbPOiShDUG7jf6ADocRoDbkLZdBs6X6RfS2I3g8UWUPY4Vv/iDNL44JYIKGTUcQTnU vuYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xPzJ6RWGoS68SghW7tn4cJYuVSMH4dBCFZHnn+nVoWU=; b=4P5khch0GLgS8pP+XeybRoxJAguLXIV6jYzHqIkUY7vtinoMkeSZ+P8oD6tP1dbcXE +cEv+zX4e3/1sV7JEuyb+1ODD1r4gi/CM7QNCcSCvnljBePYkXns42ylhwUUV5wwSkHc IEBqYH4qhSXJZYTM6IlZXbQw/3kksclWXZY2447Aj5RzZPeVw8VcFnZUVOJqqgCkAciQ +kvZa0VNSpmEjZeM3CcemEPjiETzko7BI32Z8PuFwDvlfbACoNYWv3CZM3vqtwQQveZJ p1xI1G1wTq0UE2VQ1W6LQs1Hz4NufGItoQkwJ1rFu/rDl6TOrOloLnOzcpFBz22yqU56 OB+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Hzp/FAZp1R3EmAUUsNpneoz71YOUAOCy1zqMuu5CeVXWH6eJD g7JRZd/1X9iR5gYAiO2K2CyHcANJnKaJYg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5sU9se7Rf+MEIfNYHtbGv2sWJUJ6tUiuEDV18MnuzsqBuX+YNr5tWHdIEXNnia4oOK6epbQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7fcd:b0:142:8ab3:ec0e with SMTP id t13-20020a1709027fcd00b001428ab3ec0emr75541792plb.4.1637327506556; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 05:11:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k26sm2682508pfe.78.2021.11.19.05.11.45 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Nov 2021 05:11:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <81cf000c-23fa-b721-0258-5f13354216bc@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 23:11:41 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Content-Language: en-US To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <6d566e47-42cc-711e-60df-b9096f4df6c1@itronic.at> From: Lindsay Mathieson In-Reply-To: <6d566e47-42cc-711e-60df-b9096f4df6c1@itronic.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.657 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -1.727 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Ceph 16 upgrade warning also valid for proxmox users? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 13:11:56 -0000 On 19/11/2021 6:46 pm, Harald Leithner wrote: > Since I have no hurry to update we will wait till 16.2.7 is released. Yah, I thought it was part of upgrading to &, since it isn't I will wait also. Thanks everyone. - Lindsay