From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6989B86C2B for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:03:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4A9AF18FFB for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:02:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.17.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 87B9F18FE9 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 13:02:31 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1640606545; bh=g9ePQw9sWoZiM980RlK0WU1P59LPploRPhnwDlldbjM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To; b=VNbzVZuoV+A+A4+jW7n075zzQEJpCpEnop0kZ0RhTw2z2Q2OMY8Uru/JPnJgybP5D alfU2SzlDzzFnyfKD4PuBkwJ+fMFZL2ypVG9So0nAV7jAWimY/zzou4cO4bNWhzbsl 56A33PPfT9+ti9v/8fiztuo24d87SqOeW2VSLGW8= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from smtpclient.apple ([93.135.191.157]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb106 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Ma0Tu-1myZWL1Nbg-00W8MO; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 12:57:09 +0100 From: Roland privat Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 12:57:08 +0100 Message-Id: <8012981C-7A4A-4E2E-9652-F2C6C7DA638B@web.de> References: In-Reply-To: To: Arjen , Proxmox VE user list X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18G82) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Xc9g0gpCfn5gCgF2ONGa4vjcuz10B5eVeP/eSKtMBg2nUEXm4sD PKlbOZKUq2YIBWpr40jK/m/7bcL8ho3cumhh2IAHFoLx87SihWghfxQ1i6R3cbjpP2bXyyL dK/AldY7R4jqShdshOeHaxX882wUiVdaGBHfbOqcP4TmQPCkkdHtn/keuELxZu2VE3Hy08R 5Vz3eN2RcUWRzie/RV6og== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:tiqnQxYh9QA=:hFWCy9hbzq1kwJmyFUf+XN a7scHz8qUZ4Y4IAGsoQSANF9TzielO/zTyF23vyqgx5MJ+8uMy5VQyOgCe1eAYhbdzdAKzZjZ fOs3I+8k3vzOtkqZdGnUCk2HR84J4WWKsc8kAlZIR/kib0J4pmigXu/w9DP/eiSYPs0B0eU/R KIXQVe6sEiGpsopnMviUgfUTq/fR5T1BGOpZN+HeIueRQUHeu8vPDNylhQ1FALszaRMMn+dXe aUSQbIIoLVCI+xIMVAaW7CMHnXt7o1/wnoYZr5iLKjw9P01VRzmQwE/fQNOWOX2RWZhHUophB UtTRlgYdTKfir/TdwjZrMwAPfIGZEDmazSUwTuIpK1jsopFD5hwmb1ZgX6tUru/3hzGhpbPr+ kehRqUiI1NujIiYmzYboyq2seiuEPucl+IRLzn1bnwFuWsk3P7CR3LhY4KKGQquJ+9zZ33Jkl Vm53lmnQujK8tNIbsW5hEr3meZvmZ2ZQewbWV+sjLaySn/ez5utAwjGuikCcirseJ+zSvKLi2 55JWx3iUe5ty/hd0nux7L8W+nDWGvmaKLFaVHm7f8PTUbxYEW48Z07AF/9KNWJsWVoVFfPkGV Gt67oFwFbF6mTt2HkoyheNSXPYyP0THaXfQCnKMc+LEam7bf9N6Fs6Jp9Aq/vx0vT/rTtN65K aweCpfToIGp3UCFjYV/svX3Zq8LxrtDT6a8+2VUP2697EN3DVqRxJ/GD+hZiJgcStafAMMAq0 seKSB+6O0bwTYWIfmbENcPz2kH5cvu7APJ0ifiWJwi4mI5ZICn/aWIPa5L8yBGWr/0iXtthzE 5yd955EAnLP50uSwlS+z+/rtHYcpGDrSVSz+p91su8edf+/s+GA7OCK7QyMyKAObo/D6dceEQ NmFgmbg7cW6lNBbJIDKtT9iNCLwnjrZmzjK93zDYRfEPWyKDv+h+PABfSkFQEKq4RjjkC0oJY KEi1WbaeTDWS3z/KYLbWCjOILPGPFZUtB0lXvaPHocCCVu2kJTpZVUh/M/iYDzsanFh0R/d0u lQSbLECHp6920rBfcTFa4r+3N536S3l4MMHDKonysna1liQyMzAQaFWfTceqVVqfqE7cOWJAO jeS5AZWgv+TmZw= X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.293 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message MIME_QP_LONG_LINE 0.001 Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 -0.01 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL -0.01 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Correct substitution of a ZFS failed disk... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 12:03:02 -0000 https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/ZFS_on_Linux#sysadmin_zfs_change_failed_dev Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 27.12.2021 um 11:29 schrieb Arjen via pve-user : >=20 > =EF=BB=BF > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user