From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D10098DCC for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:10:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E2FBD2FDAD for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:10:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [IPv6:2001:1418:10:5::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:10:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id 837BA3CB32D; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:10:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from news by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1psHF3-0005gh-Oz for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:06:01 +0200 From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 14:32:41 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: <7k6qhj-j4q.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1682660656 18424 192.168.1.24 (28 Apr 2023 05:44:16 GMT) To: Marco Gaiarin X-Mailer: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-71-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: ; from SmartGate on Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 08:06:01AM +0200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.301 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 1.049 Date: is 12 to 24 hours before Received: date DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Peak load at 7.30AM... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 06:10:12 -0000 > I'm doing some hypotesis; for example debian by default rotate logs at 6.30, > but looking at file dates logs are completely rotated before the 7.00, so > the 7.00 replica could have triggered the reboot... OK, found. It was effectively the daily tasks; not logrotate, but a task/script that do a set of 'find' in a virtual disk hosted on a slow ZFS pool (see my other post). Seems that doing a 'findstorm' on that volume can lead load to sky... For now, i've added a 'sleep 1' between find calls; i don't need the script end in precise time. -- La condivisione è il segreto di tutto... (Roberto Colonello)