From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A040A655D4 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 15:00:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9DC062D0EA for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 15:00:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.17.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D88E32D0DF for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 15:00:42 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1604412042; bh=PxkUjYb0/W3TZt8A6K1LH5HvhJgBCkFRXbRaBTBd2YY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=V2T/XBLCwyqca36qoDzrmwYsQVVkigUUeVe/HUr21kSjrCtI+IQHXAfBE7KGW86VL 2nWCKWXv+ZU5/xjL7fL544+hgWVausaGb7d7LEcWDTZOtXVBNpZioHeNZjqMniznoA 7DVKG7KBq969W/zwPaG8ldZHQ/XR1wBjxjaC5v0w= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from Rolands-MacBook-Pro.cybercon.de ([5.147.253.138]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIeUW-1kc9ha1G7U-002JQo; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 14:55:22 +0100 To: Proxmox VE user list References: <4f14e929-2118-11fa-6959-b4ae620fb7d6@web.de> <1604408555.h89cyy4u6g.astroid@nora.none> From: Roland Message-ID: <7fa36132-db01-5093-f17f-528574829ce3@web.de> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 14:55:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1604408555.h89cyy4u6g.astroid@nora.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:sasrZgshbdFKQuHf1wMxPMWg45szu/qBs8mklT7CJaTnMx+xXzo 1BvlK0olmrCLbC1q0ROBHBFtWZiBCxWWYUHIlzOTKMU7McCTvavt0vYG6MTyI4dEAmc4Y6B eDPC7qjAllvh5hFLfyV+L2RPT0y2wSfrBz6M3WW2U7nkBQs0Z6QuG46CxJ0L/XvvRjsMPqA aXjfXBnK4Osp5AjukXzhw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:ysgh/3rA3Qw=:UJhyb1FX3Cqsz19ed8xOYk 14ozVyi4leatpvwfwoVbUeN/PuZNXEgkmV3Hefp0ChECLBoNzQkA9LEvPQmV0jz41+bx++CnE uKhjY6HvK6ioWozflHFMWYClj9CLOxb84iVSTT311tSnncPK/uKelY6gl1HyJrGFp/Dw17fsa Tm1DPnkBMW1rmmc4nRlRGa1GrMzGiLGVtdswEi7k/4k4W5Ky7fvHrE2LDG/8OHgz8xPtHPxjZ jPps6ubaM2U+ay01x4mZ70RbVa9F8+GqKdqDHLl7jFwn455X7cziXGjSWqygrQ03Z09WcCQFA kKBMaAzjryDB7TYDghTwI6YQhjRn5J811jpYnGO1htCTNsIFrB01oGseyYL9BgazMPw079cQg 6ka5ITE3ticROQXA/kagC3NWO1pAeOrzp5AljoGAIusPIATiY2J0ap7kWUC6QKo9jPmC1p2hY w9feeO7CdSw64cAXzKrgwTdWRJ25bgfiMJAyzUy5Sz+tGcGH/TbTw95Y2++qtK7z/pCwxl/9D +fywHBoeLir21hv1KxUhhCJXOZAOkkJ5clqm/cNaqUBheI674qGBdQ7WvBAzxa2YQ8t3ZvmL7 iO8O+PZ3VKeygAkhwcefn/2fLc17C8pmWyIPWKj70Jhq1t3H08helKTuubxvBYXiycV+fCucs LMgWxgwnEnmHbcmIJ7cZaHQrzICcNVmAZOM0yNsVe190oKCGrSWClKM8CgoTIwGNpQVmm4kz8 jazjovEbiL+vtnJL1/XmsQATgiR+A0lm26JHrc4yA8H/GUOzONpjQABGiH1CNmWmkZDetx/Ys 1E0kSvMexcNnHYpKTfX7M00W/QJAMI3NIknGwN8jVK+Fli2qRlZOrfgfuOFoO1YEdAnE2JpTd Ni6ld0zanJk9k04V+Myg== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.020 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] pbs datastore view weird behaviour X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 14:00:43 -0000 thanks for letting us know Am 03.11.20 um 14:03 schrieb Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler: > On November 3, 2020 11:43 am, Roland wrote: >> hello, >> >> i'm sure that i could click on "datastore" root node in the pbs gui to >> get a complete view on all datastore configuration. i found this useful= . > this was possible, yes > >> furthermore, all other root-nodes containing sub-nodes (configuration, >> administration) can be expanded/collapsed - datastore root node behaves >> different. >> >> is this changed intentionally in one of the last updates (i.e. feature >> change) or is this a bug ? > most of the content of that panel was moved to the revamped new > datastore view (which now has tabs to view content, setup job schedules, > etc.). adding a new datastore was moved to the tree. > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >