From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F005A93E1F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:19:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CC2D72AC2B for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:19:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.iper.net (mail.iper.net [94.236.32.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:19:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from servercsa.csaricerche.com (UnknownHost [82.134.223.122]) by mail.iper.net with SMTP (version=TLS\Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:14:20 +0100 Received: from [192.168.64.90] (psala-lx.csaricerche.com [192.168.64.90]) (Authenticated sender: psala) by servercsa.csaricerche.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1290D20078A68 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:14:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <7606f44a-279c-c797-8206-95ea281245b1@riminilug.it> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:14:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Content-Language: it, en-US From: Piviul Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: servercsa.csaricerche.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.93 / 20.00]; BAYES_SPAM(2.03)[89.11%]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1290D20078A68 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.687 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_NONE 0.25 DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has no DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_SOFTFAIL 0.665 SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) Subject: [PVE-User] ceph X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:19:49 -0000 Hi all, during the CEPH installation I have dedicated a 10Gb network to CEPH but I fear I wrong the monitors and managers IPs because they are referring to the LAN IPs PVE nodes instead of using the IPs of the CEPH nodes of the CEPH dedicated network. To solve this problem can I first of all create the monitors/managers on the dedicated CEPH network and then remove the olds monitors/managers having LAN IPs? This operation is safely? Piviul