From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49C236012C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 15:00:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 34CA31559 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 15:00:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay163.nicmail.ru (relay163.nicmail.ru [91.189.117.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 28EBB153E for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 15:00:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.28.138.152] (port=27154 helo=[192.168.8.155]) by relay.hosting.mail.nic.ru with esmtp (Exim 5.55) (envelope-from ) id 1nEthQ-0007zo-CT; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 17:00:01 +0300 Received: from [62.105.41.93] (account tsabolov@t8.ru HELO [192.168.8.155]) by incarp1104.int.hosting.nic.ru (Exim 5.55) with id 1nEthQ-0003wb-OE; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 17:00:00 +0300 Message-ID: <748c01bc-3d9f-5f10-9249-dcfa7b3b8211@t8.ru> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 16:59:59 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Alwin Antreich , Proxmox VE user list References: <34d1303e-1b35-6a1d-5221-a762f78792d0@t8.ru> <5e1b7f7739e33e8fdcc97a5b097432f9@antreich.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?0KHQtdGA0LPQtdC5INCm0LDQsdC+0LvQvtCy?= In-Reply-To: <5e1b7f7739e33e8fdcc97a5b097432f9@antreich.com> X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Auth: dkim=none X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 -0.001 Average reputation (+2) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Ceph df X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 14:00:10 -0000 Hello Alwin, In this post https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/ceph-octopus-upgrade-notes-think-twice-before-enabling-auto-scale.80105/#post-399654 I read about *target ratio to 1 and call it a day *, in my case I set to vm.pool  Target ratio 1 : ceph osd pool autoscale-status POOL                                         SIZE TARGET SIZE      RATE  RAW CAPACITY   RATIO  TARGET RATIO EFFECTIVE RATIO  BIAS  PG_NUM  NEW PG_NUM  AUTOSCALE device_health_metrics          22216k       500.0G   2.0 106.4T  0.0092                                                     1.0            8 on vm.pool                                     2734G             3.0        106.4T  0.0753        1.0000                                       0.8180 1.0             512 on cephfs_data                                    0              2.0        106.4T  0.0000             0.2000 0.1636   1.0             128             on cephfs_metadata                  27843k         500.0G 2.0        106.4T  0.0092    4.0              32              on What you think  I need to set target ratio on cephfs_metadata & device_health_metrics? To pool  cephfs_data I set the target ratio 0.2  . Or the target ration on vm.pool need not the *1* but more? * * 31.01.2022 15:05, Alwin Antreich пишет: > Hello Sergey, > > January 31, 2022 9:58 AM, "Сергей Цаболов" wrote: >> My question is how I can decrease MAX AVAIL in default pool >> device_health_metrics + cephfs_metadata and set it to vm.pool and >> cephfs_data > The max_avail is calculated by the cluster-wide AVAIL and pool USED, with respect to the replication size / EC profile. > > Cheers, > Alwin > Sergey TS The best Regard _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user