From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AE157433F for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 13:33:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1B72C1781D for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 13:33:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A28F21780F for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 13:33:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id c15so2766439pls.13 for ; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 04:33:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=5ifJfKq8lw/XCVyOtvIZ30rmX6m4NvAukw3I9mdCCsw=; b=qYxo6sLF6vY0kR0h3Ety8Zbf+2hqXKMA4zhCXz2p+yRzGyq0s9teHUfkUK10CJRqKG ed/B+uWUoFxU/fCM+HDKB46vtrpgY+bXwMBgHKcYgGeyVgv4SfShTARB+Z8VloXH0ReV gF38Wjjol6KK/93x7wGyykanHEJmnDL7StPFAgSKKqsbuGaVj2IaFpSSuhUkKzuMQYPE u8zf3EBvtkKHZERyDha8hlUtYTd4Xl0kK7VRKFc0Bk4909rP62lHcqGdCKyxlbo6PygM TYJc9NQdP2S3mIxz4MXIlGzSLXgM3OB4aRVRmSW0BMrDNltUgnrw8eC23JLdCygSHj79 sSMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=5ifJfKq8lw/XCVyOtvIZ30rmX6m4NvAukw3I9mdCCsw=; b=eV3swl8HVX6li/5RM8goEptA8KpFt/dVTWIBo7kcCdxcPK+1bzcXpJ2JrWwHtbZxmp XKxyapw1/xIravG13cKXCutCtHRKosPfHX42EXygLHs2WjHWVWqNotnTO1YrKfNEg+C1 ilpR2pEnkWWEgD63fZ+R2mjbFHYNQKKdD8JqiXAldQSWHQ2fESc7eHumpS/ksWVQGW6s 7I4/El33eMcgi2TfJFB5fTZKYeUqdtMigReYHotZVySoXEuk3Gnzjee6Fa6WTbjS/wY/ jxbwOgT+lDfQAHrlIentCPbZO83LSs3ROvYj5d4CD/EHDOERvjIMPGR6C78Ohe+yl7i+ tpiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531eNKSNES5S8LN/dhbddBGTo1kyft/OJHyPdMgBHZbAI+7DFBa+ 7jk3CI2X5f4yh6TlzGOXmaVgcwJbIXl82A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxaJ4dwOUkKXewo676FnglgjNIPB26gxJXdvRPgMNkIVZvrr/UWi6xn6TlMaL60C1C/ieNa1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bd03:b029:11c:d504:c1ce with SMTP id p3-20020a170902bd03b029011cd504c1cemr25423635pls.7.1625743998105; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 04:33:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.125] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u40sm2533978pfg.19.2021.07.08.04.33.16 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Jul 2021 04:33:17 -0700 (PDT) To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: From: Lindsay Mathieson Message-ID: <747c141d-4d96-dffe-bff7-85c269b1e2b8@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 21:33:13 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.949 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox questions/features X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 11:33:27 -0000 On 6/07/2021 7:00 pm, Alex K wrote: > - I've read that qemu does use*libgfapi* when accessing VM disks on > glusterfs volumes. Can someone confirm this? I tried to find out the VM > configs that may reference this detail but was not able to do so. libgfapi is indeed used. > > - I have not seen any*load balancing/scheduling* feature being provided > and looking through the forum it seems that this is still missing. Is there > any future plan to provide such a feature. By load balancing I mean to > automatically balance VMs through the available hosts/nodes depending on a > set policy (CPU load, memory load or other). I don't believe there are any plans for load balancing, to many variables at play to usefully automate it I believe. -- Lindsay