From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD19D88656 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 12:08:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B05FD1CED8 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 12:08:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id DBBDD1CECD for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 12:08:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1641553706; bh=RO8HQvLW8KUatUa9ftjP3AOOk0bGRBRdU011WpjQR6I=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Subject:Date; b=iyZJIbdVZz1QVmVRP2bpZk+Aogxj2bXgSca5adNMAWIrHTaUe+q7jyTX1TR037muU H332hGfAA3QMAdILYO01PTwdlu6FHxsv2dsp+k+9SV1ZXXoOHOw2XAPe8thzBBuX3s fsWJyNsEza1LZLO4YDes3LKFwUCV/VQo+suC21nA= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from mail.localdomain ([37.209.60.78]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MDQic-1nGGsE1GGE-00AZDI for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 12:03:16 +0100 Received: from main.localnet (main.fritz.box [192.168.2.20]) by mail.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CFE84314E9 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 11:59:17 +0100 (CET) From: Petric Frank To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 12:03:15 +0100 Message-ID: <7332849.EvYhyI6sBW@main> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:7pjK74zOUkRsjc6zAwlG6qTGVTkGDMMKZgQoYVnse4kGeq7+bCL QP4Xd911KmlT/FBNr/kSKYYnPUk4WRX/bC1b5LCIbMxPC6ptAqG4RWwhHHsgb1QYj5DE6uk Ah5ZtwW4RMk7Zimafme4ustGhcBSc+QeUh7SmcVmkM/9wxS/aaeeiIrL7l9xbkkN2HU5vck nNLRRrAKnNT9eZd1C/2mA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:sXs/vKCxMrU=:FDRG6ewIh4cdwT148M4Qyu r5OlFQNp/GcgKJhNmyHe1KDF+NG+0fgmPF4qhFcaeVdWYIaszn9LkYAiCeL6c32oaIgClzMFo dNEaTWe3gEJ0eJ/dj6+fqEc0mrsoKHbkBoGEs7QssLGgXJJFea2f6PAg6m8YBA6SpiKKd4g/D frT6rEmJU7bmzqIoJZNxqF/lrlhipzF/3Sa/mRXIHBkxBapdQQsyijOtxFxAQoxIOHUw2Xyz7 /7dtV0+rHHfoscj59o8B5yTcZ8kRMlJ70OKJvLmKUAOJQDCHX0EWGSAZkTJ2mhoFomWn+BUOY II4RO4kiWasVZHbFXZhEjrlKRxVwQW+veBhK98rBeKBfFIZVrPl1dvLt3OzG3M56GXcce7VJQ L4agtN+yn4vFrExV2KnyZQNahnBGk4iZBON8d9Am5vrFjS/0xaxRNrWmkAquhLVyAmbYxalRQ P97mKHXWPWw2aa4nAfaZQ4kPoY2mKNmpjW/j8I9GUI2XhwElGo9yY6mUh/TiU8Np5w939BR59 gqI/RqoEoLy/NO+mAkSvMAcEInCsTq7hZvzvf5gj7hM8ctI5qZ5KVQKumVh+lvbvB4KWC9U22 acUIxN7/ODjLM5V1/9DFd7CgLxjcOF0lRRCJi2byXE1mFOvqw4KajNRhnkjBx8SpDE0rccNwn Rx8KdG4fBZnXUeRZNJGoy42gxYl7CUvrKkR20FSaJjeEVx+yakWO+B6zPEKQ1QqfHro5TmcJ1 boHPEVvbSdqDoH8BgOhy5rFNbVZkbKIjRUjhoH82fPpT44oqzdxKD7xONNPlMYwC4nXm+u1dD jzjGBOYxxDaASo5/NytpvZ4tPQgdtpckL4w+IF1xAJhXJFfwiAqQ8dWSLxrzcJyGCLcymK0/U exqob2ZyLjvNM7ngOQ+vDwmuqlV7EmdpSRcHXfnTEH13p6JuO86JrPGPj/jhp575yhoNVQnza cDIKs739sNSnFfTwsmMx2kcvB9pvCEqqvDMrorqKoFIKlpLxauCmlpUIUfpjxuNW3fr7II8uZ OsArpKgxjeNiDygDqAkPyG/kh3BYihKinVAdgcUnB6elwnTli0Cy7d9IkgMJHTa6I2fHsO2e6 IE5ITjDJm7H4IU= X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 2.057 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W -2.5 Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-WHITE RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 0.001 Excellent reputation (+5) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [PVE-User] dist-upgrade throws error X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 11:08:34 -0000 Hello, during the upgrade this morning i get the following error message: =2D-------------------- cut --------------------- root@proxmox:~# apt dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Error! Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libpve-common-perl : Breaks: qemu-server (< 7.0-19) but 7.0-13 is to be installed E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused= by held packages. =2D-------------------- cut --------------------- apt update was executed before without issues. I am using the "no- subscription" repository: deb http://download.proxmox.com/debian bullseye pve-no-subscription Could the repository have a problem ? Any hints ? kind regards