From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E576AC7C for <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:03:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 73E6C695B for <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:03:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:03:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id r65-20020a1c4444000000b003d02dd48c45so279791wma.0 for <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 02:03:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EKMQ2IrCmr19BOKNIahskaMassAFdZBV7RN6pi58Ze4=; b=Uf/HJ3976XzKYbTGeGE9NKBttsd4h4Rs6l6xDrrCkC8c8jjgnMYn8stI2aaUhAQu15 uzzeMzWCPUl9C+3lctz5xQ1F73n12g5oKlAxcXRanq4wWpire/Q14Aoo505xj97jcz1Y K+63YaAe+SDw6XDJ2tbqECZh1XgOfGqfdfqyMIwJ+QAjUfa3Qc8gvwDLgwx5bZ2SWLg0 Tbb9GMAT22ZHsgbWRCLn5hNIiBRkqq2DyMvK1nBpefcERB+YtYLYAs+aDnxnYWzQxYD0 rcloc3D+X7iZD4uzT190Uash81200K7P2R5djokVC7yHG/1gPte5XxfLkPIFWTdn0QAn cNWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=EKMQ2IrCmr19BOKNIahskaMassAFdZBV7RN6pi58Ze4=; b=2UmptLcJZFfSWjUf7ON8hM76hvsSoWVaT6gQBnHmk270vsa5iHmy12BWFCX1NtAZhj srQ21fMqyW53Fepyy7FGxryu8Wn4jRWcKFYZZE3axf5PlDxA5UdYXdj4VG7YlZjLfIkF TBNNNWxZM6N6sk1vaLzk5SoTzDex0Ml5NzG2Zn+orARzxPNv+WAYv75ZV6rKCFZpIcYk HPa4kdgYVKrNuemsepGUL2MR6M4svjJmMoiFLbjfVTvlq3ja4Ba7bAMVY1oeHaYwhEAI HvKJvNKPdwBvGr5zqsaO/M35D6nsiNrwQsngGhYp3o3L1YXfgR25tQGnTh6JwnASOHeP fIEg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pk0uquYfzxa0ykFhKdVBkGhPq/7gLkYV9topTlwl8QbSzUe44X5 qvSyRsPV4GrilUsaRcGR7dJ1u5aUz7E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5Jhw7d4O0elmpnD86LAcYX8xp2bNwgvDWrzwnrNfbH6+jB/LjR8Lqro/AXFXI1LpzRwBkxjQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f006:0:b0:3cf:ecd8:330d with SMTP id a6-20020a1cf006000000b003cfecd8330dmr5764976wmb.130.1669111381742; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 02:03:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:7c0:201d:13b:5605:dbff:fe76:161c? ([2001:7c0:201d:13b:5605:dbff:fe76:161c]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d5-20020adffbc5000000b002417e7f0685sm16093924wrs.9.2022.11.22.02.03.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 02:03:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6c0e3f72-e303-a5ce-2c31-3aa0550d76a8@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 11:03:01 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com Content-Language: de-DE To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>, pve-user@pve.proxmox.com References: <684a30c0-462f-6a74-0d26-1fcae814b9d5@gmail.com> <1669111204.2isxc986qz.astroid@yuna.none> From: Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1669111204.2isxc986qz.astroid@yuna.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ceph-volume binary missing in Quincy ceph-osd package X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:03:09 -0000 Am 22.11.22 um 11:00 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler: > On November 22, 2022 10:52 am, Uwe Sauter wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> looks like that ceph-volume is missing in the current Quincy ceph-osd package. > > it got its own package now: ceph-volume > > but it seems that is only recommended by ceph-osd, so depending on apt settings > it gets pulled in or not.. > Hi Fabian, looks like the package metadata is wrong then as apt-file still thinks that it belongs to ceph-osd. And "pveceph install" didn't pull it in either. I'll install the package manually. Thanks, Uwe