From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC2E41FF15F for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:43:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 975EAB511; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:43:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=n7qnm.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From: Reply-To:Sender:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JaRIOJr9LQZM0I+B1IqG7Pz95fKJKxULBJMjRxtsf2Q=; b=kEIwOBTWF3Nfr9PBkElu4Qx0uX Vz7kx3BkW1Pl7R12EJJyQmdtWRqsCJ5JiWQF+F7378K3iXU47bv3QFJVFz5kYa/1y7eEcrutRZuvg CTcoY3SB9F1zpadiyh1h/Ngb4Z1zs7zf4e6suto4s7tSGHF6xZyhAKbWc5dGeqFgQ3XvtJhONoHCd +KOZVrGafcg/wW6UA93SBKq1IiRXlElcIsB7hxPkGriIy0+DSbNwQicV5gtoT6AofMQiUaH7p1/o6 4Tz6+ai3tXxfSHHErGzqZt9YbmIQD9QsPbQ/VYMzDuJ5E6PBvBK3xf4jlX/Trh1x9MksD3UVRHCnZ rTGYW2dw==; From: To: Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 14:06:57 -0700 Message-ID: <6c0e01db18fc$d87ae700$8970b500$@n7qnm.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AdsY+wnEwJjByjJBTEKFfbVBdSrCkQ== Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - elderberry.viviotech.us X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.proxmox.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - n7qnm.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: elderberry.viviotech.us: authenticated_id: clayj@n7qnm.net X-Authenticated-Sender: elderberry.viviotech.us: clayj@n7qnm.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 1 AWL 1.348 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_20 -0.001 Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [PVE-User] Change Ceph Public Network X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: clayj@n7qnm.net, Proxmox VE user list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" I have Promox and Ceph running on 5 servers. I currently have 2 NICs in each server, a 1Gb NIC that's configured as the Ceph "public network", 192.168.75.0/24; and a 2.5Gb NIC that's configured as the Ceph "cluster network, 192.168.70.0/24. The .75 net is also what connects the servers to the "rest of the world", including some Synology NAS servers. I have a 1Tb SSD drive on 4 of the 5 servers configured as Ceph OSDs. I'd like to get better performance out of Ceph, so I added a 3rd 2Gb NIC to each server, 192.168.71.0/24. I took down all my VMs; and in ceph.conf, changed the mon entries and the public_network entries from 192.168.75.xx to 192.168.71.xx; then did a "restart ceph-target" on each of the Proxmox servers. That was a complete disaster! Ceph never came back up and I had to reverse the process in order to restore. Is there a "correct" way to do this; or did I just miss a step. Is there a config file for the OSDs that I need to change? Thanks in advance! Clay Jackson clayj@n7qnm.net _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user