From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7341917D1 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:52:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A986A293A7 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:52:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:52:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id a80so12592367pfa.4 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:52:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=p+KianwEnQtMFJ9l62mDIZ7pyGBFxTSvmOd/TXnQebA=; b=iNSeDcx/kSmUpv71KkrkLFyoRcVJgT6HGiNpRfHlLX6Uh86bOMPcHALtxVvIx0H+sU HbsvW9gs3lUse3hmxpXw/LTYQjtRaMicfUfMPyzBj3W7a0zFQEMnnkH8q4JnTcqMvg65 06oyxUnmvYPNntn12EzVD0MbnsOUrzZUiN5Tj/ZhGCQr0jhG+d64FIR86a4CoMIaiJjL AWDC3qnzjAxc4fQu4L+eT8GjQMR5o46QgTN7euHI7wNtUKGg3qO9tmOH76ub9zW4xDvD q0fwjXFCA+061dAiblf1tibCXTyuYSwgdQKeKta/bVECG5VudoEi7vrNghv30kIgVgN/ cMdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=p+KianwEnQtMFJ9l62mDIZ7pyGBFxTSvmOd/TXnQebA=; b=FaUVvqvBiZGQo+Yb+3BAWWkrmib27l/SBn5Wq+aFiB0GpWUxLmY2z2xg3Q7tPyhAWJ JL2tsPlpMVo8RXOa3GBTbHIac0wPBQ0Y2ypGbYmvLM6sryOdby6i/CyhF8w+i6hGkhmi XX7Dn+zmvT3/5vw2clfc6ePfggoKtOLveI6rMshN7YgBVXHQnh0KP1w8VgfyUPX+B7ym z9bHCXNIqeM4tpFtMpQQQY9vuiHtbxwJXWCLXyXaaQaHR1ExocJ/f5ufrhLo3cLWtadn YKoKVAN5y+xI+ZwKFNlY3FArp5iM3q/hYp3LsrhQMeyHLuVnC8z+VJjHmMevjGCD6XgT Hd8w== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf19yx56s9qPzPBFAit9e27tRUczYcfVcdtMo6Qw0edOvoWC/7pS QWnGJ2dPw2gaVUDxPK8U0uQgJzlowBp7bA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6cTUHm35If+a4V0NRF72HwAsFRJHZWZg1LFzn890dAPTN65m2ulbpL1zajkGtSlf/4v09ESg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:234a:b0:542:f9f2:72e5 with SMTP id j10-20020a056a00234a00b00542f9f272e5mr34418089pfj.34.1664373124168; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.161] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b12-20020a1709027e0c00b00176a2d23d1asm3849176plm.56.2022.09.28.06.52.02 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6509db48-819b-7fd9-cb01-4511e0f7b440@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 23:52:00 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.1 Content-Language: en-US To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: From: Lindsay Mathieson In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.924 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -2.319 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 08:03:27 +0200 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PVE LXC to ESXi VM X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:52:43 -0000 Yeah, that won't work - LXC containers are fundamentally different to VM's On 27/09/2022 11:38 pm, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > I'm trying to convert a Debian 10.10 LXC container running under PVE > 6.2-6 into ESXi 7.0.2 VM. -- Lindsay Mathieson