From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63C8564ED1
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun,  1 Nov 2020 21:17:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 57BCA1D74D
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun,  1 Nov 2020 21:17:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A42951D73F
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun,  1 Nov 2020 21:17:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6227845FE5;
 Sun,  1 Nov 2020 21:17:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Bernhard Dick <bernhard@bdick.de>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <1bea39e7-d656-d809-0774-baa935479f53@bdick.de>
 <7d0ea9da-3b9e-d9da-a2f6-1c7f5eca11f8@proxmox.com>
 <746ccce3-578f-c75d-8958-f3776b7f1166@bdick.de>
 <9c16c66e-6a83-4da9-84e8-28efa0ff7c3a@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <64aa6821-c21f-fba2-091b-89536d5d6b5f@proxmox.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 21:17:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/83.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9c16c66e-6a83-4da9-84e8-28efa0ff7c3a@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.008 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.257 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Backup broken?
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 20:17:59 -0000

On 01.11.20 20:48, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> with using
> `apt install` this still checks if the package is valid (i.e., signed by a trusted
> key):
> 
> # wget http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pve/dists/buster/pvetest/binary-amd64/pve-manager_6.2-15_amd64.deb
> # apt install ./pve-manager_6.2-15_amd64.deb

Albeit, I have some feeling I was confused here, it's late Sunday after all,
so be safe check the SHA256 sum.

# sha256sum pve-manager_6.2-15_amd64.deb
3b5a7377406ae9d85757a5ac31d9e2688a87acf878d6bc0ccde2e5475cffa651  pve-manager_6.2-15_amd64.deb

cheers,
Thomas