From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA02D98E5
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:01:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C330B374CB
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:01:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:01:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DBA6F44BF4;
 Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:54:41 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <63ca3e92-0b8a-872c-51f3-5249118aa6ba@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:54:41 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:108.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/108.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com, Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <4dda05de-6d33-3fd1-a282-1996b4797a43@gmail.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <4dda05de-6d33-3fd1-a282-1996b4797a43@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: =?UTF-8?Q?0=0A=09?=AWL -0.035 Adjusted
 score from AWL reputation of From: =?UTF-8?Q?address=0A=09?=BAYES_00 -1.9
 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 GB_TO_NAME_FREEMAIL 0.01 Freemail spear phish with free
 =?UTF-8?Q?mail=0A=09?=KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure
 with Strict =?UTF-8?Q?Alignment=0A=09?=NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit
 reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF
 =?UTF-8?Q?Record=0A=09?=SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF
 =?UTF-8?Q?record=0A=09?=URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query
 to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] bugzilla.proxmox.com is missing "pom" as product
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:01:16 -0000

Hi,

Am 18/11/2022 um 10:24 schrieb Uwe Sauter:
> I was just searching bugs and noticed that Proxmox offline mirror "pom" is missing as product/category.

yeah, we waited until there's actual interest; until now most feedback came
in over the forum's (mainly via the announcement thread).

Anyhow, it exists now.

cheers,
Thomas