From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C983A1FF16F for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 22:11:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4691C11688; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 22:10:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 18:55:35 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: <5letql-mot2.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> References: <4sidql-6r83.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1759261422 1058449 192.168.1.45 (30 Sep 2025 19:43:42 GMT) To: Matthieu Dreistadt via pve-user X-Mailer: tin/2.6.4-20240224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.14.0-32-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: ; from SmartGate on Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 22:06:01PM +0200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.461 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 1.592 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Analysis of free space... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" Mandi! Matthieu Dreistadt via pve-user In chel di` si favelave... > you can check "zfs list -o space", which will give you a more detailed > view of what is using the space: [...] > Used = overall used > Usedsnap = Used by Snapshots > Usedds = Used Disk Space (not counting snapshots, only live data) > Usedchild = Used by datasets/zvols further down in the same path (in my > example, rpool has the same amount of Used and Usedchild space, since > there is nothing directly inside of rpool itself) Thans for the hint. Anyway: root@lamprologus:~# zfs list -o space | grep ^rpool-data/ rpool-data/vm-100-disk-0 11.6T 1.07T 0B 1.07T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-1 11.6T 1.81T 0B 1.81T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-10 11.6T 1.42T 0B 1.42T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-11 11.6T 1.86T 0B 1.86T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-12 11.6T 1.64T 0B 1.64T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-13 11.6T 2.23T 0B 2.23T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-14 11.6T 1.96T 0B 1.96T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-15 11.6T 1.83T 0B 1.83T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-16 11.6T 1.89T 0B 1.89T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-17 11.6T 2.05T 0B 2.05T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-18 11.6T 3.39T 0B 3.39T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-19 11.6T 3.40T 0B 3.40T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-2 11.6T 1.31T 0B 1.31T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-20 11.6T 3.36T 0B 3.36T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-21 11.6T 2.50T 0B 2.50T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-22 11.6T 3.22T 0B 3.22T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-23 11.6T 2.73T 0B 2.73T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-24 11.6T 2.53T 0B 2.53T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-3 11.6T 213K 0B 213K 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-4 11.6T 213K 0B 213K 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-5 11.6T 1.48T 0B 1.48T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-6 11.6T 1.35T 0B 1.35T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-7 11.6T 930G 0B 930G 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-8 11.6T 1.26T 0B 1.26T 0B 0B rpool-data/vm-100-disk-9 11.6T 1.30T 0B 1.30T 0B 0B seems that really i was able to put 3.40T of real data on a 2T volume... -- _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user