From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE63E9E7D8
 for <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com>; Thu,  2 Nov 2023 08:18:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C03F2CB0C
 for <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com>; Thu,  2 Nov 2023 08:18:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com>; Thu,  2 Nov 2023 08:18:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0985743A2F;
 Thu,  2 Nov 2023 08:18:22 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5e6b02d4-c728-4f64-a8bb-bd3e50701053@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 08:18:21 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Stefan Radman <stefan.radman@me.com>,
 PVE User List <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com>
References: <05A38B49-ED49-4093-A58A-8988F778D89E@me.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <05A38B49-ED49-4093-A58A-8988F778D89E@me.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.017 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com, qemuserver.pm]
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Use of uninitialized value in PVE/QemuServer.pm
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 07:18:57 -0000

On 11/1/23 20:36, Stefan Radman wrote:
> 
> I might have hit a minor bug running Proxmox VE 8.0 (with latest updates from enterprise repo).
> 
> When HA manager tries to live-migrate a VM that has a mapped USB resource attached it fails with the following error:
> 
> task started by HA resource agent
> Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/share/perl5/PVE/QemuServer.pm line 2699.
> 2023-11-01 22:20:34 ERROR: migration aborted (duration 00:00:00): can't migrate running VM which uses mapped devices: usb0
> TASK ERROR: migration aborted
> 
> While I understand that live migration with mapped USB resources is not (yet) supported, I think that the warning
> 
> 	“Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/share/perl5/PVE/QemuServer.pm line 2699.”
> 
> should not be there.
> 
> Has anyone else seen this warning?
> 
> Stefan
> PS: the HA live migration succeeds when I use the USB Vendor/Device ID directly, instead of the mapping.
> 
> 

Hi,
yes, 'use of uninitialized value...' error shouldn't happen.

would you mind opening a bug report here: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com
with the exact versions you have (pveversion -v) ?

Thanks and kind regards
Dominik