From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA3DF9245F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:52:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CCB2523C41 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:52:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out-83.di.u-psud.fr (smtp-out-83.di.u-psud.fr [129.175.213.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:52:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out-1.di.u-psud.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-1.di.u-psud.fr (UPS-MTA-OUT) with ESMTP id 4NhpJ85dr2zbsqw for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:52:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from pmx1.di.u-psud.fr (pmx1.di.u-psud.fr [129.175.212.152]) by smtp-out-1.di.u-psud.fr (UPS-MTA-OUT) with ESMTP id 4NhpJ85WT0z1F8xy for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:52:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-in-1.di.u-psud.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (UPS-PMX) with SMTP id 4NhpJ85LPpz8Bp; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:52:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [129.175.212.70] (smtps.u-psud.fr [129.175.212.70]) (UPS-MTA) (Authenticated sender: alain.pean via 192.168.71.7) with ESMTPSA id 4NhpJ825PZz7d ; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:52:24 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: smtps.u-psud.fr; auth=pass smtp.mailfrom=alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr Message-ID: <5b795a94-ebd3-7793-a7c3-4567cd1b04f0@c2n.upsaclay.fr> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:52:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Reply-To: alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr Content-Language: fr To: Proxmox VE user list , =?UTF-8?Q?=c3=93scar_de_Arriba?= References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Alain_P=c3=a9an?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4NhpJ825PZz7d X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.030 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.147 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.001 Informational: message has unparseable relay lines Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Thin LVM showing more used space than expected X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 10:52:32 -0000 Le 27/12/2022 à 18:54, Óscar de Arriba a écrit : > For storage, I'm using a commercial Crucial MX500 SATA SSD connected directly to the motherboard controller (no PCIe HBA for the system+data disk) and it is brand new - and S.M.A.R.T. checks are passing, only 4% of wearout. Hi Oscar, Just to be sure, because normally wearout is 100% when the SSD is new, You are just soustracting, and it is in fact 100-4 = 96% ? My SSDs (Dell mixed use) after some years are still at 99%, so I am wondering about 4%... Alain -- Administrateur Système/Réseau C2N Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies (UMR 9001) Boulevard Thomas Gobert (ex Avenue de La Vauve), 91120 Palaiseau Tel : 01-70-27-06-88 Bureau A255