From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B426961C41 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:07:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 95EB77004 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:07:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:07:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E02D245C1D; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:07:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5980bb1b-057e-8136-cf3a-2793ce9f7be7@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:07:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE user list , Joseph John References: From: Aaron Lauterer In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.081 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Guidance on how Proxmox 8 treats Intel VROC RAID controller on supermicro x12dpu-6 Server X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 13:07:32 -0000 Please have a look at the same topic being discussed last month https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/2023-June/017117.html TL;DR: VROC is usually a "fake raid" and not a real HW RAID. It only tells the OS what software RAID to create. On Linux that would typically be MD-RAID. Proxmox VE does not ship MD Raid and therefore, those disks will still be visible as single disks. Cheers, Aaron On 7/26/23 13:44, Joseph John wrote: > Dear All, > We are trying to install ProxMox 8 on Supermicro x12dpu-6 , with Intel VROC > RAID Controller , we have configured two SSD in RAID 1 , from the BIOS in > hardware level and raid volume is created, but when coming to the proxmox > setup , the installation step is not showing the RAID volume, but it shows > the physical disk separately . > Like get guidance on how Proxmox treats Intel VROC RAID Controller and the > possible next step > Thanks > > > Thanks > Joseph John > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > >