From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F35662044 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 09:09:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8EA5F97CF for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 09:09:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D9D6997B5 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 09:09:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id f2so3155074plr.8 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:09:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=ktnakFyhrNhUpp/WHjJrqb2KiLNgk0tGGWFHwws578Y=; b=Hetru0/ZU1iOckakxl++w3CxyceYSkOG+MGvNqoqErKdRHG5eujzHWW62HOzgMPHy7 qkmA+bsTQOh3bRig93sXmDhPjbv6g0x4yAc5/Rs3A49HSIGpmRpW06Q0U7RkOElKJP7s vSDazsIxQVsy+p4tAkhd9uHgIzKMa0CnGhjuZkYFkMJl7zfOKWFf87s+JZBXWHjwjz7d SWAwvlTYa8sqJWG9p1y9m55CdY18UNzeOjfgUZyhSeEfMn0RdXEg9Sdhq56B9S9ciOuG zrzIgAfl0R9zz5vhlu8XfUXD61l2ayANp0Qagm/QJHQu1ijRTYUu40gVwkgoTF/hnPM7 CxsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=ktnakFyhrNhUpp/WHjJrqb2KiLNgk0tGGWFHwws578Y=; b=QN8Tj6Iu6UOq3ebEghJZXCokkC87OpBMM5eKm5ZtayLC4lS1g+4Lg2E+xdpjdsaXBc rPQPKIJwMSeqlYH/BI5lqpqa8nzf0XIgZcCKDjnYXcqLfhmS9XO/AFbNvCJseuh0zam3 VycKhNyzyyhaMjnkFzs8/R+DnbGBbcPRaAaQcTloQ2u9wwPqrGAXVxScju1OD/MYThTc jzvwPB/D+s4aWb9llnd+hquUgUHqhEbwjKN/Dptlm4kUBFdLFEqhxqkk/Q7Zc1MtJ6Io UwuWmaIMaPoeyrVZ9c/xX2PPXBZFxqMM0s72YugkB5jwrXNGEPmlKdFvG3b9Nb2uFQLQ LHNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ueZvMerO38SLpDOU97Pd91JjNjUwtqTnQtBzr0Dx90wEk4T/y XAVVVLvo2XE9Fz5JvCe/3XsSFUoiTpA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzSpIhUYnFuKFzXxVaLm0vKqr7ecmLFYZYRBtS2YJ4dNY5yva2v+SCJTYHpI5H2TOw7+j6uw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:380b:: with SMTP id mq11mr9708018pjb.46.1594451391170; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:09:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e195sm7779903pfh.218.2020.07.11.00.09.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:09:50 -0700 (PDT) To: Dietmar Maurer , Proxmox VE user list References: <5ff0ca95-a2fe-7d89-3300-0a872dd7bddf@gmail.com> <643258476.506.1594449193539@webmail.proxmox.com> From: Lindsay Mathieson Message-ID: <570fbad1-ae4c-7f22-b5b3-e2bdbef13371@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 17:09:43 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <643258476.506.1594449193539@webmail.proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Backup Beta - restore failing X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 07:09:59 -0000 On 11/07/2020 4:33 pm, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > Please can you show post the pbs storage configuration? pbs: backupbeta         datastore test         server 192.168.5.49         content backup         fingerprint 1c:f0:e0:76:67:a5:f3:b7:b6:2b:5c:33:xxxxxxxxx:98:8f:31:15:0b:0d:53:93:2b:2f:52         maxfiles 2         nodes vni,vnh,vnb         username proxmox@pbs > Seem there is a problem how we compute the repository - the datastore part is missing. > It should look like :. For example, if your datastore > name is 'store1': > > --repositoryproxmox@pbs@192.168.5.49:store1 > > You can test easily if that works with: > > # proxmox-backup-client snapshots --repositoryproxmox@pbs@192.168.5.49:store1  proxmox-backup-client restore '--crypt-mode=none' vm/311/2020-07-11T00:57:52Z index.json /var/tmp/vzdumptmp121335/index.json --repository proxmox@pbs@192.168.5.49:backupbeta Processed without the param verification error and I got asked for the password, and two fingerprint verications/did I really want to continue prompts, but then it fails with: Error: HTTP Error 400 Bad Request: no permissions nb: * Std install with no custom certs, so using the default self generated certs in the proxmox cluster and backup server * Have added the pub keys to authorized_keys in both the ProxMox host and the Backup server so automatic ssh works in both directions. Should I try adding the backup storage in proxmox as a FQDN rather than a static IP? -- Lindsay