From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 482C66139A for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 03:38:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 375DD2CE17 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 03:38:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from relay01.etecsa.net (relay01.etecsa.net [181.225.231.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0206B2CE02 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 03:38:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-gw01.enet.cu (unknown [172.29.8.31]) by relay01.etecsa.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F39FE0096 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:38:28 -0400 (CDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nauta.cu; s=nauta; t=1599961108; bh=5q+TIym2sOBNjfB9RN/GOM7GEsM4lwX8EN6EGmbdgEg=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:From; b=A1WlQqHfkDjsfJ+Toci4fffnBwUQLVXAT89+KVZ1XLv0mRxUhAnz+TjBtPsXFZWI9 k6GepmOQ3ki84zSTvY6vMWyd2xwOxSXWp9I7cro13EL9fM3KMUjOg9FP3L3G+KGRfY +QVChHgQfuNm0KQFXVd9i8ldSWUcppsRew1QlS9E= Received: from amavis5.etecsa.net (unknown [172.29.8.236]) by smtp-gw01.enet.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C10C1800054 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:38:22 -0400 (CDT) Received: from smtp.nauta.cu ([172.29.8.248]) by amavis5.etecsa.net with ESMTP id 08D1cRBa022557-08D1cRBb022557 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:38:27 -0400 Received: from [10.76.243.224] (unknown [10.76.243.224]) by smtp.nauta.cu (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5958E9F2A7 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:38:26 -0400 (CDT) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 21:37:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Proxmox VE user list From: Rommel Rodriguez Toirac Message-ID: <56890E94-5AA4-4F6F-93C1-80E478880338@nauta.cu> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [nauta.cu, proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Problem downloading repositories X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 01:38:40 -0000 El 8 de septiembre de 2020 4:45:02 GMT-04:00, Mechtilde escribi=C3=B3: >Hello, > >URLDIR is incomplete=2E > >Please look at the description how you can add the proxmox repo to the >local sources=2Elist=2E > >Kind regards > >Mechtilde > >Am 02=2E09=2E20 um 22:05 schrieb Rommel Rodriguez Toirac: >> Hello all; >>=20 >> I use a little script to create a local repository by downloading the >packages=20 >> from the official site [download=2Eproxmox=2Ecom] using the debmirror >application,=20 >> for this I use a server with Debian 10=2E5 operating system and >debmirror 1:2=2E32 >> This is the script: >>=20 >> ****** >> #!/bin/sh >> : ${URLDIRE:=3Ddownload=2Eproxmox=2Ecom} >> : ${OUTPATH:=3D/var/www/html/repos/proxmox} >> : ${LOGFILE:=3D/var/log/actualiza_proxmox=2Elog} >> # Crear el directorio de destino si no existe=2E >> if [ ! -d "$OUTPATH" ] ; then mkdir -p "$OUTPATH"; fi >> # Inicio archivo de registro=2E >> cat > $LOGFILE <> Iniciando Mirror (`env LANG=3Des_ES=2EUTF-8 date`) >> EOL >> # Matamos el mirror si ya est=C3=A1 corriendo >> killall debmirror >> # Ejecutar=2E >> debmirror --progress --verbose --debug --host $URLDIRE >--root=3D/debian/pve \ >> --method=3Dhttp --dist=3Dbuster \ >> --section=3Dpve-no-subscription --arch=3Damd64 --nosource --no-check-gp= g=20 >> \ >> --ignore-missing-release --ignore-release-gpg --postcleanup \ >> --diff=3Dnone --ignore-small-errors --allow-dist-rename --timeout=3D200= 0=20 >> \ >> $OUTPATH >> $LOGFILE 2>&1 & >> # Fin=2E >> exit 0 >> ******* >>=20 >> I look at the logs and the download always interrupts saying that >dists/ >> buster/pve-no-subscription/binary-all/Packages=2Egz is missing=2E >>=20 >> ******** >> Ignoring missing Release file for >dists/buster/pve-no-subscription/binary-all/ >> Packages=2Egz >> >http://download=2Eproxmox=2Ecom/debian/pve/dists/buster/pve-no-subscripti= on/ >> binary-all/Packages=2Egz =3D> [100%] Getting: >dists/buster/pve-no-subscription/ >> binary-all/Packages=2Egz=2E=2E=2E #** GET >http://download=2Eproxmox=2Ecom/debian/pve/ >> dists/buster/pve-no-subscription/binary-all/Packages=2Egz =3D=3D> 404 N= ot >Found >> 404 Not Found >> Download of dists/buster/pve-no-subscription/binary-all/Packages=2Egz >failed:=20 >> 404 Not Found >> Errors: >> Ignoring missing Release file for >dists/buster/pve-no-subscription/binary-all/ >> Packages=2Egz >> Download of dists/buster/pve-no-subscription/binary-all/Packages=2Egz >failed:=20 >> 404 Not Found >> Failed to download some Package, Sources or Release files! >> WARNING: releasing 1 pending lock=2E=2E=2E >> ********* >>=20 >> At >http://download=2Eproxmox=2Ecom/debian/pve/dists/buster/pve-no-subscripti= on/ > >> actually there is no binary-all/Packages >>=20 >> What am I doing wrong?=20 >>=20 >> How can I fix this and download the full repository from Debian 10 >using=20 >> debmirror? >>=20 >> Thanks in advance=2E >>=20 > >--=20 >Mechtilde Stehmann >## Debian Developer >## PGP encryption welcome >## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F Hello Mechtilde; sorry for the delaied answer and thanks for write back=2E Where I can find the description you mention? I use this script since 2 years ago, last week start with this problem=2E --=20 Rommel Rodriguez Toirac rommelrt@nauta=2Ecu >From Jean-Daniel.Tissot@univ-fcomte.fr Sun Sep 13 16:44:10 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8BC66147A for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:44:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E397E8A05 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:44:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ufc-sortie.univ-fcomte.fr (ufc-sortie.univ-fcomte.fr [194.57.91.199]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A25B889F4 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:44:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ufcpriv204.univ-fcomte.fr (ufcpriv204.univ-fcomte.fr [172.20.194.204]) by ufc-sortie.univ-fcomte.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302C2607B0 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:44:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ufcpriv204.univ-fcomte.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss91 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1941D403D870 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:44:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtps.univ-fcomte.fr (ufc218.univ-fcomte.fr [194.57.91.218]) by ufcpriv204.univ-fcomte.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4D84038FA0 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:44:02 +0200 (CEST) To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <1635826713.690433.1599897851168.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> From: Jean-Daniel TISSOT Organization: CNRS - UMR6249 Message-ID: <2134f824-5e9e-9a2f-1ea7-f2a89adc550a@univ-fcomte.fr> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 16:44:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1635826713.690433.1599897851168.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.772 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -1.543 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [univ-fcomte.fr, openstreetmap.fr] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Problem with ifupdown2 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 14:44:11 -0000 Hi, Thanks for this tips, I will try tomorrow, I don't like to keep residue from packages deleted. Le 12/09/2020 à 10:04, Alexandre DERUMIER a écrit : > if you have purge ifdown, it'll disabled networking service. (ifupdown2 use the same service name) > > Simply reenable them with "systemctl enable networking". > > > about ifenslave, it's removed, because it's not needed by ifupdown2. > (ifupdown2 don't need any /etc/network/if-*.d/ scripts) > > > > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Jean-Daniel TISSOT" > À: "Proxmox VE user list" > Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Septembre 2020 13:05:36 > Objet: [PVE-User] Problem with ifupdown2 > > Hi, > > I installed the ifupdown2 package from the Proxmox repositories, this > uninstalled the ifenslave and ifupdown packages. > I usually uninstall configuration residue from packages deleted by the > command: > apt -y purge $(dpkg -l | awk ' /^rc/ { print $2 } ') > or after reboot, the network interfaces are no longer active > > The command: dpkg -L ifenslave lists the following files: > /etc/network/if-post-down. d > /etc/network/if-post-down. d/ifenslave > /etc/network/if-pre-up. d > /etc/network/if-pre-up. d/ifenslave > /etc/network/if-up. d > /etc/network/if-up. d/ifenslave > > The command: dpkg -L ifupdown lists the following files: > /etc/init. d/networking > > How is it that the ifupdown2 package does not contain these files since > its installation removes the ifenslave and ifupdown packages? > > Thanks to the developers to include the files necessary for the proper > functioning of ifupdown2. > > Best Regards. > -- Bien cordialement, Jean-Daniel TISSOT Administrateur Systèmes et Réseaux Service Informatique UMR Chrono-environnement Tel: +33 3 81 666 440 Fax: +33 3 81 666 568 Chrono-environnement Laboratoire Chrono-environnement 16, Route de Gray 25 030 BESANÇON Cedex Plan et Accès