From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pfrank@gmx.de>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEF4788795
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat,  8 Jan 2022 00:37:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E010921C28
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat,  8 Jan 2022 00:37:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest
 SHA256) (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 3299021C1A
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat,  8 Jan 2022 00:37:48 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net;
 s=badeba3b8450; t=1641598661;
 bh=FaTmjR+0uOoYkDnck2QquZOk0LafZOmTVmSmO0Et4Y4=;
 h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=eN8bHz6llPIW4KGTKy70vrMSUWrjAm8BCDaTlIXmd+vUgHqfItlUD/YskdC+jNAf8
 N8zDyk5OWJyg9fekCKt01OjI5QFUhlm9IvdrVnAK6Gl9j++MkpxwvNgqSweHlefZwX
 m4ULCTEOYvPCKFarrjCJ38JVkjzsDonKpUUlivmY=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from mail.localdomain ([37.209.60.78]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104
 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MeU0q-1mXjub3MDU-00aXsl for
 <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 00:37:41 +0100
Received: from main.localnet (main.fritz.box [192.168.2.20])
 by mail.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4771C314E9
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat,  8 Jan 2022 00:33:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Petric Frank <pfrank@gmx.de>
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 00:37:41 +0100
Message-ID: <5684758.MhkbZ0Pkbq@main>
In-Reply-To: <8877761.CDJkKcVGEf@main>
References: <7332849.EvYhyI6sBW@main> <8877761.CDJkKcVGEf@main>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:jDngG61EeJGLMHUX4gakv+IgTzoWE+TVuQ9KataV5stNwdJipC0
 YOGwEPb9ElZp7fOsL++Zz4e520IXTFG/0TnVbwY0s0Xm9gmzN2WF2wLFusK0zDs7mJy0faD
 UWCecrwAAkD+uQmsRis6W7UwoxPFc1Gx8f/FBa8I5CzEbonNZdpMhlfb4vDTfuNYB7vgVyT
 0uSeevHQYZdvX4pGn2k0A==
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:rhPMe7qxjJs=:QpQajhfQNjUOiP0RA0j1qG
 bYgdY+fbNw9CeIxShvATRHTW1+RHaX72Iy9zGPcobzvObgdbU0DSZhJdy7D0dzL4gtV41N0QH
 BSPtMkn1HX+BEx/Jv2oUgRZeLnECdefV9ZCEESN5mpI8Xcgiom4PwBUjUeHmWv/g54VY5/WcL
 rxxox5SfQU9fiNYLvnBfeSJ1mGnL7U9HhtYYZaz1CwIsDAfvHFyvDKbsIBGk1MBVc8MbmmsyW
 ivXhtgtZHfmsGoXgiTBIPDtW3Q8AzKw8MIrMjr2mEBfx5jhp2oK6fRMCUHvkmlp2uBCnFdN5l
 VpKqItP8BtUIgs5Nlnifdm66UkvEklLFK1IZxgU/rRk4yNj7zYrVDi+gsLwwxQnZE/95I8waz
 660adcEVlJGrEtRzZMcJXM+XkppguPbRKY4YenyFZSPfhPUAIeeH7TXtbS9FpEnsWx4QvXl90
 SrF5gJtA/7wfwDZwGn7Et8MsJZMus9Z4jqIZVg5C0vq0DiBahn7JLSXUbLYN9W6I7HWvP4ig0
 Z70bC5X7g1isIa5Y12O4oByy4CyQ62Rf7Jtd5J1XkSqWXkOpsXzdH63b/4dioaKQtQkcktZUZ
 Od0WLDF1cpvXqbqV2gaWCilg4AXeQopp0rRL52bLKWo0CkYZuR2nc+FR3+qJgRwiaQ+zfWlrx
 jUlpehqHSVUL9TR1CYyUEf4Y4UPxt/ulAmLf812Kzd1AL34dJyWl9WY7KtueK45J4UCUcXxsn
 gB5LUG89lo7caMGQx/gTobj28+eE4+bGrHj/3NQCyDt5N7FxW/GK1TyxUI1LWd61KbyJWCFcA
 7AoKgaRq5uuKgXXKotunBR6qEzaoVTfmdFCmTGPq4HLolrSqv/8aJKy2yyZFf5+dNd5vzCGac
 t72tbkJxJlTUB/ah7dCSIn8vPR8QloTOf77Q/eityhwCJzleVjSY2HWLqpT4QBMYdqis82asO
 0wfUVaps8aCxpJ5pNBblkFIfTV9HOLiV7jkf2oYyh5J+HWW3dfyIPIu+TviPlGmaQ/QHVDd48
 pymVSC3HOOTw1CQAva6+M9PscTlMosZGFUG6ldR0P7qG9aJv1tyq0B/U3OKZPY1A+x5AQUVIB
 fZsuiQbT2tw1UU=
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.488 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
 KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS        0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW        -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4       0.001 Very Good reputation (+4)
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL       0.001 Mailspike good senders
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: [PVE-User] Solved: Re:  dist-upgrade throws error
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 23:37:50 -0000

Hello,

somehow there was a package on hold which blocked the upgrade.

regards

Am Freitag, 7. Januar 2022, 12:46:12 CET schrieb Petric Frank:
> Hallo,
>
> followup - found the pve repository wrongly configured. Now set to
>   deb http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pve bullseye pve-no-subscriptio=
n
>
> according to https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Package_Repositories
>
> But no change in the error.
>
> regards
>
> Am Freitag, 7. Januar 2022, 12:03:15 CET schrieb Petric Frank:
> > Hello,
> >
> > during the upgrade this morning i get the following error message:
> > --------------------- cut ---------------------
> > root@proxmox:~# apt dist-upgrade
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree... Done
> > Reading state information... Done
> > Calculating upgrade... Error!
> > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > or been moved out of Incoming.
> > The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> >
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >  libpve-common-perl : Breaks: qemu-server (< 7.0-19) but 7.0-13 is to =
be
> >
> > installed
> > E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be ca=
used
> > by held packages.
> > --------------------- cut ---------------------
> >
> > apt update was executed before without issues. I am using the "no-
> >
> > subscription" repository:
> >   deb http://download.proxmox.com/debian bullseye pve-no-subscription
> >
> > Could the repository have a problem ?
> >
> > Any hints ?
> >
> > kind regards
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pve-user mailing list
> > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user