From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4359D61BC1 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:10:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 32A762A539 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:10:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.merit.unu.edu (mail.merit.unu.edu [192.87.143.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 339D82A528 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:09:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.87.143.100] (ws100.merit.unu.edu [192.87.143.100]) by mail.merit.unu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DBB0819B9A6B for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:02:33 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=merit.unu.edu; s=2021-1; t=1642510953; bh=9x/IYsVqsvnt3oruisoN9ltQJ1o+fP3Z4ZONfr97TlQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:From; b=BjYpOEJnfutfnmeyFSOd47fI/j2U+e6dsr65Ys5ns71ErysInf72bUx1lxsRiCtrI qnASlSht+rDB+JjkK9+rPv1Wmg8kJrl+ybF5LbhrdzkuUzgM4WPSuwSF2E1SyIAJTn Lcc97gb12v+0YQDpElW4tdW3puO48JTw5x4bd7bGUD14ySsmBicISKnmsMWL6mOv1x VR4FFCQl/sOTUk+OjStAalh70DqOdYFeXGTVJgsfLfG1LlJpb6XU31ue9VWsYj7VPc O5QKee44NpQbOnkfwDbnCtedHC+O4KgqIhg9/vRdr1eZNur91gdHDxQ559/w2dzZHp 75YvWM32LYODA== Message-ID: <5488c340-0a68-cb7d-4e65-e9a5fcfa7f23@merit.unu.edu> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:02:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 To: Proxmox VE user list Content-Language: en-US From: mj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.553 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com, unu.edu] Subject: [PVE-User] windows remote desktop services as VM on proxmox X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:10:00 -0000 Hi, We are looking into windows remote desktop services, and would like to see how feasible it is to run it through our proxmox cluster. Currently our VMs are all linux, so we have no experience with windows VMs on proxmox. I have read some of the docs on the pve wiki, like https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Windows_10_guest_best_practices But looking for some practical guidance, like how well do windows VMs run under proxmox? Anything special to consider? Thanks!