From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54C4799175 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:10:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 33A292C21E for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:10:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:10:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id AFDA03CBF7E; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:10:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from news by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ppUvB-0000ir-R8 for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:06:01 +0200 From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:34:15 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: <52h7hj-mvo.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it> References: <6nj5hj-3a81.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it> X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1681998793 313 192.168.24.2 (20 Apr 2023 13:53:13 GMT) To: Wolf Noble X-Mailer: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-70-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: ; from SmartGate on Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 16:06:01PM +0200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -1.688 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_20 -0.001 Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 1.592 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [PVE-User] DELL PowerEdge T440/PERC H750 and embarassing HDD performance... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:10:06 -0000 Mandi! Wolf Noble In chel di` si favelave... > The voodoo of zfs and how it talks to the disks is a vast and confusing subject??? there???s lots of moving pieces, and it???s a huge rabbit hole???. Right. But this seems a 'good passthru raid0', more like an JBOD mode then a raid0... anyway, SSD disk connected to the same controller behave correctly, so it is still strange... -- Se non trovi nessuno vuol dire che siamo scappati alle sei-shell (bash, tcsh,csh...) (Possi)