From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D795D080 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:58:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 55E301D91A for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:58:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.14]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:58:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1692255493; x=1692860293; i=devzero@web.de; bh=C9PP342T7DJA77UhMcPSMKX3bLQZU8XdNhhS8KXH1JA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=JfxNVCmmYFyZGK/QjjcEWU+dtsS4JJ0motgqB8R2Js2TNwEseNnx9wswN+woUOKsR0f3ESe tX2NxFIZw2VuwgQ6Az66G94HvlAvkkIimltk0XtkWxSk/kmiG8J6uhTfOhqCRiSMeVjP61whG 6Cj3TBPUzlUzpU18dNo4vxGNdxixLl4/cGw38yB5WdR0BskdXtlTiWojyeMqHWrGXBwjhEMFt QO7CAGK9NhDM9wJLGANn02WzDrVoAFxz8m3BiJbR0NKzInRs8xG++mpF1aME/EvGs1iBSLJPd 6K2WlCwxmXNA99rmY4SgSGV89MnEFtr6YIucV+QTpO14anTLYx1w== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from [192.168.179.90] ([81.173.181.202]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MQxnv-1q9eWQ2Wn9-00NeLv; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:58:13 +0200 Message-ID: <4fcabac5-83f8-497c-b219-b4a0c9729b99@web.de> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:58:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.1 To: Proxmox VE user list , Joseph John References: From: Roland In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:pZNS853oOmcAmn1abmKC5+5SZxlqMUM/troIahvuTIxsizDEDEM vQt9q7QfDse4S9lG1240EVIiztN0PNIV3zLkYxSQ6gDYRIrZuEeiY+6DZ1Uu9h8m7Neo5R1 RNF2ytmSujd/hZN+7ydZyJZGjbqKCAVRi+xZSAbNT0FL91UWSewQa8CUzm2L6QumX0HQmeG VVEhKu3U/OLXR6d2LjIWw== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:B9zE2rNSsCs=;/t42pcvpPhUfpYGHxNRYSp1xG+l Dh7D5E7I2Ise+kgAfWHaWAdltonHGofb7fk+pK/wecRt8IMnIwAPEGJX0zas7Z3G1HqRpDRbr /sH3V6SY5GM5+u0J35NvoPrmHnJM/A9EOy7QJ7tB/Q0pjKcH4Oy5FY8J9eenWULlZnkv0kXjd I5EYcqI0BVwnokisuRIajGRZ7W8zBYkT9O7X6vLLgHPTylwXtyquWHbyv4GhuzfHPFtajpyfy oUkPZyrqOjp4IhIa8i3ijvOBQj8Mr3eYxIhIEq0tLaVE7/sWPXasw4sxGWlNVnzGtOqrodYZu osXCaYtJ7TdZFfDbLzpt1kAQqcmsMlVGR5+B4j6MkfPLRAO/fQmTiGDBtSj5K1kEai0DUlWc7 uzzPeWoBtCjCgramm1qFthklXeFVQo5xpThDdCloVZDapD9yG8piCCYvt6uRZDtkVF9/nd+9r m6utfIgOHT9ugUrX+QBHJWWcqwuY25Jsk1GwZQ1vAFMkT4p+QkG1ra223VVUKK6L6RTHAVW5H KIrZF/6lbvjtGbhbU89h4LIE2AqJyK5FZjL/XMD7M66vt3FI3QTsm7XGjt9ptzFjmcQ59Tupq N5kFC2cs5ftu8dRsCvs+n+Zsp6GDcRwnb6q10tuxbkt4Q9QoVzDoaHpsKqHnv3xhBwA3XHvhr knXt820MIy4Sxc2eVGcY7kEEDVVqfHsdi8j6LAm0XH/Z3zVBqKlIY6t1sUWtYy7d1CQ+XmmUE t2+ncXCo751Z/PIrOJBUk0othupUdYcrKJD0ibIu5W2yWLMaLBN0SWT2uTNEgooQxWdNsk91N r6Dpt7QpC4DpnXqeqLPVReDIYHJgcTKr/JllxAvxvIAojbCklOXve7dcpx4Jgs1UbY6Ygk+UL lA7zB8lKVpplPdsQSMATU/7kUlemZa4+A5mwSobRufjt79ca4SiVV2GYtRZSTJ7BS2sIbuROn KbJyKPq/Lmu8AVidkuU6xPw0Ao4= X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 2.182 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Email that uses ascii formatting dividers and possible spam tricks NICE_REPLY_A -3.165 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 0.001 Excellent reputation (+5) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] IS able to login through web interface, but the status of the VM is marked as ?? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 06:58:21 -0000 https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1410 https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D4519 Am 17.08.23 um 06:57 schrieb Joseph John: > Dear Mark > THANKS > Like to give the feedback, > Most probably the issue might have been occured because of the loal disk > getting over , reason is that I was moving some images from my old > instance to the new instance, this may be the reason why this behaviour > happened > thanks > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 12:31=E2=80=AFPM Wolf Noble = wrote: > >> that tracks=E2=80=A6 the =E2=80=98why=E2=80=99 still could use a bit mo= re digging, but I concur >> that tracks error-condition-chain wise=E2=80=A6 >> >> oom feels unlikely coz other lower priority stuff=E2=80=99d break first= =E2=80=A6 >> network loss? >> >> time issues? >> >> stupid high latency/context switching? >> >> could be a lot of things >> >> >> [=3D The contents of this message have been written, read, processed, >> erased, sorted, sniffed, compressed, rewritten, misspelled, >> overcompensated, lost, found, and most importantly delivered entirely w= ith >> recycled electrons =3D] >> >>> On Aug 14, 2023, at 02:15, Mark Schouten wrote: >>> >>> =EF=BB=BFHi, >>> >>> The message =E2=80=99Transport endport is not connected=E2=80=99 point= s to a >> fuse-mountpoint. Given that pvestatd can also not write its statusses (= you >> see question-marks, that points to pvestatd not working), I would assum= e >> that the pve-cluster was broken. You should probably see messages in lo= gs >> from pmxcfs and corosync (on all nodes, I suspect). >>> =E2=80=94 >>> Mark Schouten >>> CTO, Tuxis B.V. >>> +31 318 200208 / mark@tuxis.nl >>> >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> From "Joseph John" >>> To pve-user@pve.proxmox.com >>> Date 11/08/2023, 07:03:48 >>> Subject [PVE-User] IS able to login through web interface, but the >> status of the VM is marked as ?? >>>> Dear All , >>>> We are using PVE 8.X EE , we have 8 node cluster >>>> today one of the cluster , we were able to login through the web >>>> interface, but the status of the VM machines were marked as ? >>>> We tried to login in using SSH, were able not able to init 6 , it wa= s >>>> showing the message >>>> >>>> root@pve-4:~# init 6 >>>> >>>> *Failed to set wall message, ignoring: Transport endpoint is not >>>> connectedCall to Reboot failed: Transport endpoint is not connected* >>>> >>>> Later on we did hard reset and the system was back >>>> How could we know what was the problem?, which log files should we >> use? to >>>> understand the issue >>>> >>>> Advice requested >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Joseph John >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> pve-user mailing list >>>> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >>>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >> > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user