From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A880F624EA for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 03:10:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 95D0415221 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 03:10:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6089615213 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 03:10:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id m22so5288726pgv.9 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 18:10:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=1ACKRwUb2Z6Xq0j+Xf8Z5q2QadAaa9FD1YYWwcA+3/k=; b=tWpYKWEj5z87Id3V5zMMD9j6g6kcr4Qnn282zoA4Cg8yCCOlCDwHb9ARIQunlnp1gj gi3FxQH0+sJyR00UrV4XPwjzGJhyUKDazSmdYZwVyKVL67MsJ9oroiHIESrThxIugPq6 St+1SDzXSSNn/9FBNUdoepYmNHM7NMxwvqIyaIxSKHeTuAcEdFdR/vt70YAmTifgyF9B Pbo/vQrmbNc6gVyfrrQ9c4Als3BEycoMFpVsqlxEwQzy3V3hATE64l6NmrvrBAm28pf2 zWBgdBmHEApOZHWGYTkliU13xGHcJIxClF6tvh9wYvIQ8XYjHxodg3pN6OORZsAOtvT6 s/dA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=1ACKRwUb2Z6Xq0j+Xf8Z5q2QadAaa9FD1YYWwcA+3/k=; b=SayWkPgvzaSOlZhYUyooWIwFN5dC6wIbGhiqB219tcYk1Td+DK4iceSKGRU8TUCe+U jg1Rf71+EyPqfcP+nzMq/PfC9Ed3GGm9P6mBOhTpA9NvaHxAJq0/dIGe3aHREG8Pn7v8 EOB+lDpiUqYFOTqyyyQdpd7wFYJC+bEWYPkK8Oom0DPnVczZYjhdqAThG5ihamnU98Jk lrOwRg+mYDEuXG9eXhzGNYr/VYJvZdNqQ5eeWi3EIpuPlnn0QOqNFzIq1gcwMw7abhiW NbdZsSG9ghAW+w1k8ff2//ritQc+sH8T4p8elcJjR/yoGzP7jcnNMwgjoEEsfkUtSl8Z jmtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wgpQjWpmpN3fFKwtuc8IW1fmcMIUqS8Cgcg2Sx8nwS1MwKn93 Jgw2heTMgOfMkGdT9ePQMFr6XwV0zxU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEIp4BBcwCEcFWcfa+aPJSPsIdSASoP6SQLgjNiUbeuse0Lbn+T8v8070YBLtd+lgVo+/Y5w== X-Received: by 2002:a65:400a:: with SMTP id f10mr62507169pgp.197.1594602643835; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 18:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id nv9sm13089776pjb.6.2020.07.12.18.10.42 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Jul 2020 18:10:42 -0700 (PDT) To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <78148244-01b5-0921-7d78-c4517c231e47@gmail.com> <568120523.549.1594571306775@webmail.proxmox.com> From: Lindsay Mathieson Message-ID: <4e38b093-6a1f-1a04-1ebb-dfa6014f3196@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:10:40 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <568120523.549.1594571306775@webmail.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] BackupServer Feature Request - Compression display X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 01:10:53 -0000 On 13/07/2020 2:28 am, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > We do incremental backup using dirty bitmaps. Gathering > those informations for all reused chunks would slow down > the whole backup process, so I am quite unsure if we > want to do that ... Maybe I'm missing your point, but I wasn't meaning the incremental display of read/write during backup (though I had noticed that changed), but just the end result of how much data is stored. There is no easy way to tell how much space a backup is taking on the backup server? -- Lindsay