From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B51C0749ED for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:11:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AB1221705D for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:11:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.17.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 78C2F1704A for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:11:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1618841455; bh=Kl30wkeBzepRqLCSfQ2uoA0eTzXznUair/nN+bpX7RM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=kTJETzkQd2lYyU7Re1CTTIf+/dKA4JZzRN9nDvFLqjwBMiQS4761N/k3+ltfsafvH mVAaUZKtcHjZJlcgNqCfp8t4kLxG4vzD5S3GkDo1soBEVfrXoYgZnnX1BoPb52+zcs H47WfEyADqObyj5ZNsqiia9Sku5ObnwvSxCYDziY= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from Rolands-MacBook-Pro.cybercon.de ([89.1.134.52]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb106 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MIyeG-1lFIiL1OOY-00KPqA; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:05:11 +0200 To: Proxmox VE user list , Marco Gaiarin References: <20210419133849.GN3268@sv.lnf.it> From: Roland Message-ID: <4d87a555-3c3e-0819-404d-cbf65da0b9f1@web.de> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:05:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210419133849.GN3268@sv.lnf.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:+hLsp0ARySOXLLO0WEL9szG+Nu5NJ3XIuOrnmNgV5oJx/e88Vmt jcFaUs9y1IXSf6a230gYqZxbTNpi0feprNm4mZ8feKBeXdm8wmcDdFg4qxyTeKNvL9bZ1vH 9ZG9Mcx0Fwr7w0tWUlCqo9jufWbCizNt7n9JGemKkD1PQAylxI0ZXLkxaJMXULp/m4fSuxQ NL2XWeX9GrvCYVhpp5cDA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:69gEa+2QcX0=:sA3fZXfeAYG7IOspRbqqiU vZxAeeAi5rcKfKC111G34/cWeoJJ/uBcy2Vz1I/oKUENQA65fyYOai8PnWgzaot2V53n/nEoh ZqxN5rWhgytllky9wB+sbLxKJ24vhaQCip3HuLJ2uiQQY9l2cE08lRU6PP15BEryQXqy9Tixm EfC9gtmgsetOsK+MKCSP69LnfulKYmq9d6UONvZNnMCc7pbTqMRd4y56YXFbhn5NMt063GeYt MQg5Dq4cUhDl22mfZ2wf1ntNRb0lbEqebRxLWJicl5m8RAVidrLEwTTnuK4UqeUYyjXyIz6Q7 LX20jhgOHYPjCT2ZUtD/OE1lx3F9gPJ/l3c/sMxEyAtXJr1K1W3FATG33pEV2E1sPdsH34zh+ BBWC4r6oaqulHk5lV2pStSAhdMdRa1oCP3q3APRlOC+Ef6xeINIT+g7Rimsz0031/zQAf4ghf cExBJ9404BJPLidKr+bgN19QvaIa/NrKoHRormTcTfYBG3g65/J8WzXmio95JJFBj++D9bKA7 K/i7KSYEaxvEzusT67Q6GdEr6zFH81K2/+Ss79Sbr8WKAmABjxuddOt1qw5ZhcFcQe0EeQJgL d2w0wUwuXR/hj564jjrQfIa4BNCghQPRHmZXhrVuN88sa4P3WOqEgiz/3HVdQAgdgkYy7oM6Y n9YmbGEeJzJKJz2o0u5qwUzrOCyMc211gDxYcI4vxfuonWAHguQ28dxMpp6YKNaUKAc/l0+o+ u1uqfL9UwjUaUBpCAp+/4QZCAlvayNEq7BLweFwpmZ7C8xJebBifM2+99vhsq2oa36vOei1L0 DRqsjDZ1YBy2W5gbHgwnUQsewpkKTI5E6BMt2t4QGg15xAbncg0cxaMlZBSfeuj4U7Cos9OfG 3z3u4YRKbDi0dMZ1zu/zru3QLIvef6/BBtjam6NPgURkkL5bVxDYz4+4yJirwXdcB2//BfWTL Ghwa5qZOQto62T4oMOCAsIRoHIC6gXgcTCUsWGdQLtolEEDBYZqK02ifaOuAXXJpdkNOCDZ+9 Rmhh8KFawv49txjvzPdR03Vu2U1hnC6omS9WL0B4CkSaJVIYrl5oB/EmejC7RacIYLhpMb9gH rj8mUumiZzXeU/8cNXvVlo841LZPLVgeig7Xo2zWEQHfQgFmZZL5d+XtqVck+5xKmRS+c7Brp 1csyIfVIg5Mp9onUq5Q92cZjfePClV72txbVysddseL98k6fBeCKuTy27MG7ulczN2MDQ= X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 -0.01 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL -0.01 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] get the most of storage for a very old dell pe 2950. X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:11:05 -0000 shouldn't it be possible to replace existing controller with crossflashed perc h310 + sff-8484/sff-8087 cable=C2=A0 and you're done wit= h the disk / hotswap limitation ? roland Am 19.04.21 um 15:38 schrieb Marco Gaiarin: > Mandi! Leandro Roggerone > In chel di` si favelave... > >> What about hot replace / remove or insert a new drive ? >> Will it work without service disruption in production environments ? > AFAIk no. > > If i remember well, Linux SCSI/SATA subsystem have support for the hot-s= wap, > but need also the support for the controller/cage/backpane/... > > So, basically, switching to JBOD/Passthroug, you lost host-swap. >