From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6933968725 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:06:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5756D8CCE for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:05:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 3B8968CB0 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:05:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id a23-20020a05600c2257b0290236ec98bebaso1480845wmm.1 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:05:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kA9XZZlkkYr6VIw75jrwqQXA/xRmZgZVutvsSa3bpW4=; b=Xul6BAxYU2tVerLCHOiJ8+zxynCJEiowYSDan53oQectnAvo6eUsqnB85anRMB9VfO Kiq/+Iil/9UUHkyteH7zCs9dG3/URyfq/t36TcQgUUUClMcHbABDn602CA9+knPm4qGt xMku6k6p4UiNcFxXS47IbIz3+NDNFcBclMBWpXXvMHJ3aFIjeLgoi7t1rXgCQjkGzcpG yQxG0He9dM1SzeYh+EkJKdJi3JVksfWvuVElUN+ijGwwtGH0z4OLFisrCPM+YtuCFw// Vqh4/muqZ0bCSi8buoweigdw3rzOFp7cJUXvkgqywoHxqSXHRv8fX8Xi8EjL8AL8imW8 XIhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kA9XZZlkkYr6VIw75jrwqQXA/xRmZgZVutvsSa3bpW4=; b=WZ1+9LzX6SYMnr8Pi9ht8Aqc55s95MqGAAtSCZOiz27bSZ+AteseUNfKIKdLfgbchr l+rVvaCwgO2ZoduOV7/5PZN9kWGKt0Lkdtpk7rXUQRVqUnqHldMMa9Ebld46+HZl/LVo bk7PYIR6tGd7a89zmqTa7/6e8CHFkNgatfJuBkMH0IiudvBj9C07JnGJBC/YfS3zegay f4zhbfScAk7Ip5KUlrJ0UEGfxReU89d8WvloiJmCqCPDFlyTVMFHcfr5Vv4LlRDH6YwO k1MfTi6tswqGwWaeON/TZdTCGTZSxJITl0fnOQyhRKv6qi3JWI55+fQ5P/y1bHAcKYFj Ma1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532xbl+dRXRuc08JRoS2AMamyr2w9PeF+kWUOEyFxWeqZjn26EaT i0AteyIIrT8rkYMz9IHwjQlvdvrHfv4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyehL2EfrSgH0/YO9L/G0/was0E5hjHp32rDrGIot498AqdLESnskUsSfI4lWBqpwn4AMl11Q== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7fc5:: with SMTP id a188mr39540847wmd.133.1626890749868; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8070:a3cf:d100:5605:dbff:fe76:161d? ([2a02:8070:a3cf:d100:5605:dbff:fe76:161d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p18sm526065wmg.46.2021.07.21.11.05.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com To: alexandre derumier , Proxmox VE user list , Gilberto Ferreira References: <40e4e0a8-837e-5e1c-da40-e5119fbe49fd@gmail.com> <4bf73e157ec602e65f73bf1b16efd5dd56ed0bb0.camel@odiso.com> From: Uwe Sauter Message-ID: <4d3b11b5-9e1a-5422-9d3c-b10d95fb4b5d@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:05:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4bf73e157ec602e65f73bf1b16efd5dd56ed0bb0.camel@odiso.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.524 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks KAM_SHORT 0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR 1.242 Uses a numeric IP address in URL RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PVE 7 & LACP X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:06:28 -0000 Am 21.07.21 um 19:58 schrieb alexandre derumier: > slaves enp59s0f4 enp59s0f4d1 > > ----> > > bond-slaves enp59s0f4 enp59s0f4d1 Thank you, that's it. > > > ("slaves" is deprecated since years, and ifupdown2 don't support it) Well, even the documentation for Buster still mentions "slaves" so it cannot be deprecated for that long. Regards, Uwe > > > Le mercredi 21 juillet 2021 à 19:31 +0200, Uwe Sauter a écrit : >> No, the bond isn't created on system boot. Thus the bridge that should connect the bond with the VMs >> is created but the connection is not made. >> >> >> Am 21.07.21 um 18:41 schrieb Gilberto Ferreira: >>> So did you solve the issue? >>> --- >>> Gilberto Nunes Ferreira >>> (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Em qua., 21 de jul. de 2021 às 12:49, Uwe Sauter >> >>> >> escreveu: >>> >>>     Hi Gilberto, >>> >>>     thanks for that tip. Unfortunately the network configuration quits a few steps before the >>> bridge is >>>     configured. The needed bond0 is not created… >>> >>> >>>     Regards, >>> >>>             Uwe >>> >>> >>>     Am 21.07.21 um 17:45 schrieb Gilberto Ferreira: >>>     > Perhaps you need to change or add this feature in the network interface file: >>>     > >>>     > https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Address_Change >>> >>>     >> > >>>     > >> >>>     >> >> >>>     > >>>     > >>>     > >>>     > --- >>>     > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira >>>     > (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram >>>     > >>>     > >>>     > >>>     > >>>     > >>>     > >>>     > Em qua., 21 de jul. de 2021 às 12:18, Uwe Sauter >> >>>     > >>>     > >>  >> >>> escreveu: >>>     > >>>     >     Hi all, >>>     > >>>     >     Fresh installation of PVE 7 with all available updates. >>>     > >>>     >     It looks like I'm unable to configure bonding of two interfaces using LCAP. >>>     > >>>     >     Output from "ip a": >>>     >     1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 >>>     >         link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 >>>     >         inet 127.0.0.1/8 > >>  >> scope >>>     host lo >>>     >            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >>>     >         inet6 ::1/128 scope host >>>     >            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >>>     >     2: eno1: mtu 1500 qdisc mq master vmbr1224 state UP >>>     group default >>>     >     qlen 1000 >>>     >         link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >>>     >         altname enp24s0f0 >>>     >     3: enp59s0f4: mtu 9000 qdisc mq state UP group default >>>     qlen 1000 >>>     >         link/ether 00:07:43:18:82:70 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >>>     >         inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe18:8270/64 scope link >>>     >            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >>>     >     4: enp59s0f4d1: mtu 9000 qdisc mq state UP group default >>>     qlen 1000 >>>     >         link/ether 00:07:43:18:82:78 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >>>     >         inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe18:8278/64 scope link >>>     >            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >>>     >     5: eno2: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 >>>     >         link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >>>     >         altname enp24s0f1 >>>     >     6: ibp94s0: mtu 2044 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 256 >>>     >         link/infiniband 80:00:0a:08:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:2c:14:51 brd >>>     >     00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff >>>     >     7: ibp94s0d1: mtu 2044 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 256 >>>     >         link/infiniband 80:00:0a:09:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:2c:14:52 brd >>>     >     00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff >>>     >     8: vmbr1224: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group >>> default >>>     >     qlen 1000 >>>     >         link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >>>     >         inet 10.224.203.1/16 > >>> >>>     >> scope global vmbr1224 >>>     >            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >>>     >         inet6 fe80::a6bf:1ff:fe2f:63f2/64 scope link >>>     >            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >>>     > >>>     > >>>     >     My current /etc/network/interfaces, which is missing the bridges for the VMs: >>>     >     auto lo >>>     >     iface lo inet loopback >>>     > >>>     >     auto eno1 >>>     >     iface eno1 inet manual >>>     > >>>     >     auto enp59s0f4 >>>     >     iface enp59s0f4 inet manual >>>     >       mtu 9000 >>>     > >>>     >     auto enp59s0f4d1 >>>     >     iface enp59s0f4d1 inet manual >>>     >       mtu 9000 >>>     > >>>     >     auto bond0 >>>     >     iface bond0 inet manual >>>     >       slaves enp59s0f4 enp59s0f4d1 >>>     >       bond-downdelay 200 >>>     >       bond-miimon 100 >>>     >       bond-mode 802.3ad >>>     >       bond-updelay 200 >>>     > >>>     >     auto vmbr1224 >>>     >     iface vmbr1224 inet static >>>     >       address 10.224.203.1 >>>     >       netmask 255.255.0.0 >>>     >       gateway 10.224.200.1 >>>     >       bridge_ports eno1 >>>     >       bridge_stp off >>>     >       bridge_fd 0 >>>     > >>>     >     ##  # VLAN 155 nativ on bond0 >>>     >     ##  auto vmbr155 >>>     >     ##  iface vmbr155 inet manual >>>     >     ##    mtu 9000 >>>     >     ##    bridge_ports bond0 >>>     >     ##    bridge_stp off >>>     >     ##    bridge_fd 0 >>>     > >>>     > >>>     >     This config was copied over from the PVE 6 installation on the same host which experienced >>>     a SSD >>>     >     failure and thus was re-installed with PVE 7. >>>     > >>>     > >>>     >     Am I missing something? Am I being blind? >>>     > >>>     > >>>     >     Any help is appreciated. >>>     > >>>     > >>>     >     Thanks, >>>     > >>>     >             Uwe >>>     > >>>     > >>>     > >>>     > >>>     >     _______________________________________________ >>>     >     pve-user mailing list >>>     >     pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >>>  >> > >>>     >>  >> >> >>>     >     https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >>> >>>     >> > >>>     >     >> >>>     >> >> >>>     > >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >> >