From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B540461D27 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:23:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A9DA31E170 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:23:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out-9.di.u-psud.fr (smtp-out-9.di.u-psud.fr [129.175.213.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 3C6A41E167 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:23:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out-1.di.u-psud.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out-1.di.u-psud.fr (UPS-MTA-OUT) with ESMTP id 4Jvdyf1ZJJzbp8x for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:13:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from pmx1.di.u-psud.fr (pmx1.di.u-psud.fr [129.175.212.152]) by smtp-out-1.di.u-psud.fr (UPS-MTA-OUT) with ESMTP id 4Jvdyf1R97z1QjDg for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:13:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-in-1.di.u-psud.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (UPS-PMX) with SMTP id 4Jvdyf0wmbz1YVR for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:13:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [129.175.212.70] (smtps.u-psud.fr [129.175.212.70]) (UPS-MTA) (Authenticated sender: alain.pean via 192.168.71.7) with ESMTPSA id 4Jvdyd5CW2z3P for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:13:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47ba4e16-73c2-22b8-1549-375b53ba59c1@c2n.upsaclay.fr> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:13:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1 Reply-To: alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr Content-Language: fr To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <075f6b81-6696-eb98-9665-214af1224d9d@t8.ru> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Alain_P=c3=a9an?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Jvdyd5CW2z3P Authentication-Results: smtps.u-psud.fr; auth=pass smtp.mailfrom=alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.196 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1 Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery methods NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.001 Informational: message has unparseable relay lines Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Update proxmox X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:23:10 -0000 Le 10/02/2022 à 13:13, David Martin a écrit : > Thank you for your reply, > I will first put the system packages if there is not too much adhesion, and > then update the proxmox packages. > I use proxmox GUI as much as possible. > apt-get install --only-upgrade If I remember correctly, between 5.x and 6.x, there was a major upgrade of kvm and corosync, which resulted in the disparition of node VMs during the upgrade, that re-appear only at the end of the upgrade. And you have a new version of Debian when going from 5.x to 6.x, that requires changes in Debian repositories, and then again from 6.x to 7.x. I would think less risky to upgrade first to 6.x, then in a second step, to 7.x. Alain -- Administrateur Système/Réseau C2N Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies (UMR 9001) Boulevard Thomas Gobert (ex Avenue de La Vauve), 91120 Palaiseau Tel : 01-70-27-06-88 Bureau A255