From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7CD7717CB for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:13:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D7ACA1BBCB for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:13:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6D1581BBC1 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:13:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1617887576; bh=KfJqM1BZEw4TN2lyQHTqZt9LUntaBTKPQNYgFRam5+M=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=POaRXFEEI5FnRpDovGaaCjRW+i68J5FdBviT0ZB7+ah6AnnKtHFAxxlr5q89qyDrY xGC4WNtxsFEltqNzlZEFngLgbZr31HoUyy5+Rgt+0yEE4931YcwV8fILEk3988Dt2A mx/KYQit9TUdVTskgf7ma5xo7UPHA6whAPzvPSVY= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from Rolands-MacBook-Pro.cybercon.de ([37.24.118.138]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb005 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MLzmv-1lCgSv0z5N-00HhmT; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:12:56 +0200 To: Proxmox VE user list , Lindsay Mathieson References: <1e49af73-aaaa-f7e7-00e4-c940ce733a6f@gmail.com> From: Roland Message-ID: <479b543a-cf3b-adda-29a3-522b9158e6e9@web.de> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:12:57 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1e49af73-aaaa-f7e7-00e4-c940ce733a6f@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cmJQJkCU3LD+Hf87D7XeNJmV992In2zo9LeZZoTrpBxsMEFdsiZ KpS4gIe3t6ipeUhBPFxZTg0TNLrRsQmlV1nbGbsh6KT1OYS1lW7QeFXKHNddpYnskKF4y5n 0B8iwCVoNkBtCMLw+6NHYe0QCV6OQPULZlsdvaFBWh/nVq0A150aaBvJZMcHh2FIXGHA1LP 5LlDgP583WO+WFkcoaNrA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:HCIXCvJxI0E=:jfTTEs1JRxA7zow5mUTu4i I891AKoGFbz8Y3pvyw8F0qioXs4tP/mKwYmkX+V5tRgrpmyFA3IDZXCwdlGc0oAdIz99Nvmr2 4DxKNoRX+BEOZ6+Cteb7/7Fr2cMC1mNDpKNyvdHBJfe7E4J7nk0ebfhnuUbdK7mTxIE/xdn+B ZPFJkgV7Ewu8+Bbd4lD71j/P8u7Zik08OsoOfH2OBKDX7l1WCq2NpZ9kAQ5oPWWT3+vHtvhDk fQ9dLByeqOy6UnMu8snUVLbAD9VddqpS7/6MnchiSYP+MTMS3QbIGSPJgQfbCS4Y7IzEyv0En vHyC58eD5klM8YCz0XQSRZX/NzznS7yjDF9/c2j8Vkizw6jNeTqt3E0lNMJlyLDdOd9QRvsrA 2qYhMIVEsBFpNrTQefojaBU7ZXayfxnyIObwpISglyh7GvGk2kObhNFbhq4JL3169KrO4ZtCm gu6XI9eDNGMxzLEHF6/LV6/G+TgZRMaVdsKcvB9IknC7PkPEVfyXSkdLPMo981Csq4vnvVPqO z1PAi3cZYvpy020+mSCUsMlP6AaP3iVA0xwNoK44W/amPL/MUX/c1s+Xs0BsA/G9ZoiFy3lqP L3B4Oy7kKpFe/n3cG1V6WVFzvUepnOdZ1WSPFxwGA2N1XpY+MElGugBhH19hclQ4f2qKZCPul iS7h8SzO+0ycAgIbc/gh3/eb7Oc190+rNKyPvhrtywwewFutg4IQ7DyJCFoAWm6z9Z7GeJYAq O8QSADcBh2tQWW/XTtzJSRsZm8P59hkCUE793F5Ke8Cj4g2c9MaYkaxHW6SHHko4BnQ7m7WxK /+9hiwd4JQbbJgifvhSlmi+CdvMfCoBS9Xoazw2tqUyvS+V3RER6Nw0cJ5NG28QMyTjrCvs1v NcvjcdDuDkTQnU/OUnwmQMvCOntDPWT6Otddj8l5BtL7YmNfnI6szGxjFpW+Hj7U22ulHmt0B 7ZTnezzg4ZblOUo0W0tnfg3+r/LLqM/HOVcDPIrOzaJP6KSGGyOCo49AQiW2tI0WrpaFmFtZW AiKBwnhQrZH1O5avjel2nZGb2aSCDXTbiZJHsm0LNokWSWGtcqUta3XC5lS9Wsid1FJm29xvj Q0wwFWXYRund+Fig+hQUO/dmfda2ee+UmCzYqI4xNIIa2w+ELxunWwdqpsKxjEm7mypeb1WfG l7jdfeSIM09Qqt0GDapyaOxYAXubwVa1XwyJffD9tl3IG2IUh8X48lWT7LFR2oQilCTxc= X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.651 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PBS and ZFS Pools Compression? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:13:03 -0000 hi, i think it's counter productive, as you are wasting cpu for compress/uncompress data, which should not be further compressible (except some smaller files like img.fidx etc) regards roland Am 08.04.21 um 15:06 schrieb Lindsay Mathieson: > Setup a ZFS RAID1 pool on my PBS server and enabled lz4 compression on > it (habit). But given the backups are already compressed, its not > really going to gain anything is it? possibly even counter productive? > > > Thanks. >