From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7992607FA for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:18:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AE722F976 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:18:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id ECB7AF969 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:18:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id k1so2019453eds.13 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:18:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=reply-to:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hidslmaFMEDmeXFoYCkptRugX7zZgYwbFEJu9wtxh5g=; b=PI74s9FId0ooEIg7uAZf8H7PBR1OHtorDK2bWvKOI/hD+KmESNhkrw4nbQvEDHuVdd hGagsda6EQ5vme+g7bmmSXszxBrfI+mEmgNmdnoUCaIFNjYUnWB5Ff6J0AeAvcWF92Jx Ks3epgVXDgug1twKErqFpxuxRw0+vVj9ZzTDwR6Zchp1qgBJOjEtrCr+QuH7S/u7N11P FdD4cUMOf2A9TP5MtqzMy6o0uKgfGE0D7v0wZWCvf/6g1yDSzdp+da7heDyfE8dT9ehr pvJGC9rFlpBGEyyfgSEbD6UuS/EbUmJP/l59WfPletdnvAXL+5wBdtSkkvewr5dEs5qA qWyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:to:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hidslmaFMEDmeXFoYCkptRugX7zZgYwbFEJu9wtxh5g=; b=r2IdFrBC6a+ju2OGEvRuvJYx333BcRUK40DOjVUzBNeoudwdR0shdDZIuKc2Ejq60p /3u1+IaZ4iJjeqqV5mZZdzdC1zhhQ34z/ljRQkCw4LCMxBcxrjcueRHE7vT3ZZn36r43 uWQPt4zdXFc7gOOuz77dGeBLnfIXdXRaCliVKKMVTC9ec50wrphboHppXu0kBHdX4gkI EMdxAuDH6rdL+jHnMilTaJsYR2CG+/F6Nr9gc9qcEZRi/qdv74T3lT8QOHMoPjhRkAnO EKk7/2tpudFElF/ktp6Vga1jcrJUWX4rpMqkREUvHqEaQl+otym7YtQ7OBMn3o7QizBk 9Ysw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530j8A3dCYwgjdEpepuMR3zWTYkbzAsTFK93hiHxXNTKtGJGNTwy aK3JIFk2LnimMo1sEHvvuIsqEQT9sd8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzPpF4YKsb3WzJaHwtenwStz+H1Bn3ovQ3KCSn6Wo0hiSLu/H3eFtki5pDNzjl/qw7NcbYdQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:da08:: with SMTP id z8mr2237701edj.170.1606393081516; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:18:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8070:a3c0:1400:cae2:65ff:fe2e:f680? ([2a02:8070:a3c0:1400:cae2:65ff:fe2e:f680]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r25sm2937553eji.8.2020.11.26.04.18.00 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 04:18:01 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com From: Uwe Sauter Message-ID: <4545c7f5-9b50-2f0a-952a-cc532ad01b13@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:18:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [PVE-User] Caution: ceph-mon service does not start after today's updates X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:18:39 -0000 Hi all, this is a warning for all that are eager to apply today's updates. In my case the ceph-mon@ service did not start after a reboot which caused a hanging Ceph once the second monitoring service went offline. Make sure to check ceph-mon@.service is running on freshly started hosts before rebooting the next host with a monitoring service. Regards, Uwe