From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AF446868E for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 19:31:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2F4E682EF for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 19:31:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 3F46582DE for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 19:31:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id y21-20020a7bc1950000b02902161fccabf1so3880022wmi.2 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:31:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oMzxvod1g6nzCN8k37fEnWLcDdyN+8oH9rYJWmuNVvI=; b=ZXUANjIaJX98e60kqCzShdZVvLlUWBMh4qDFMHQBvyEQXVHxIB/v7bBsKjmlppOf1E 1JdDlKPzqKBoU7c6AWSFHDwZBDCAQWYZv5S7QYDgosue5INo5gLxVtAwp1ipsYoPR++6 Nf7HjTuGcG1KtZJNClHa55lrtgKbmZk4znOf+/Vaw8ruZ+nksC31ybVKEtYSiG5FEvzK fzUf6ODyKSsZOGsFSn7M9Cx+KnRZY4YDZbTVWWh1DrLgHSjWV9NJmlCUn5Pv6YX/OeVN 9LLiWSv6ooEOqGyAAEbUpXqh4q8TNpUaKB9FFE/bx1yl67z9Rt0+MlqmS3eEALJmEVNL pWxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oMzxvod1g6nzCN8k37fEnWLcDdyN+8oH9rYJWmuNVvI=; b=qjZWL4h0ztGeIEu7WG4/tOZgj5ACjhhrUbQ0I3RjN1LlZ3aLoWOHdhY0bs06+SsgJo C5fiMpAqHaqLa2cHlhBpfmkzVNyp83kBX6L7VShpu2yySAYqAUDwpyV9oOikKuj2hqd7 JaT8D8wMkMs+8KWDFUp/9Fn5POyqYh9wuNDbD+C0AXuXD5k/S0N1qsXlT2pV+JT2R0k+ cq1B2nk3aKZLck2hplNaZnsLQaTdLeE2El03+gwrLhEd51PYy6lFUwBrd4SIrm/wTG2h WCzO3dtv77wTM4rjt/XUR5oDODGqZtYJaL2WSVLBjlRF8BN2ZbjIybWGRBx0h+BQPR1e sqgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ZerYQvc1e64wwAOjCkYUQ+Hi8Vp/mURL16Kaesn84OGM5R2dT cO6guZhrCkdC8K2GuhTwr5H+I0xjiDc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQ53s9mBPbPvavSt7z1i5zi/vDeJsvNlZz+TkArVdqskpSI91MBTKDlQUytMfrj6IQ8LO3lw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4101:: with SMTP id j1mr39189925wmi.130.1626888666664; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8070:a3cf:d100:5605:dbff:fe76:161d? ([2a02:8070:a3cf:d100:5605:dbff:fe76:161d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm482870wmd.4.2021.07.21.10.31.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com To: Gilberto Ferreira Cc: Proxmox VE user list References: From: Uwe Sauter Message-ID: <40e4e0a8-837e-5e1c-da40-e5119fbe49fd@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 19:31:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.185 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider KAM_SHORT 0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR 1.242 Uses a numeric IP address in URL SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PVE 7 & LACP X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:31:18 -0000 No, the bond isn't created on system boot. Thus the bridge that should connect the bond with the VMs is created but the connection is not made. Am 21.07.21 um 18:41 schrieb Gilberto Ferreira: > So did you solve the issue? > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram > > > > > > > Em qua., 21 de jul. de 2021 às 12:49, Uwe Sauter > escreveu: > > Hi Gilberto, > > thanks for that tip. Unfortunately the network configuration quits a few steps before the bridge is > configured. The needed bond0 is not created… > > > Regards, > >         Uwe > > > Am 21.07.21 um 17:45 schrieb Gilberto Ferreira: > > Perhaps you need to change or add this feature in the network interface file: > > > > https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0#Linux_Bridge_MAC-Address_Change > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > > (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Em qua., 21 de jul. de 2021 às 12:18, Uwe Sauter > > >> escreveu: > > > >     Hi all, > > > >     Fresh installation of PVE 7 with all available updates. > > > >     It looks like I'm unable to configure bonding of two interfaces using LCAP. > > > >     Output from "ip a": > >     1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 > >         link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 > >         inet 127.0.0.1/8 > scope > host lo > >            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > >         inet6 ::1/128 scope host > >            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > >     2: eno1: mtu 1500 qdisc mq master vmbr1224 state UP > group default > >     qlen 1000 > >         link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > >         altname enp24s0f0 > >     3: enp59s0f4: mtu 9000 qdisc mq state UP group default > qlen 1000 > >         link/ether 00:07:43:18:82:70 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > >         inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe18:8270/64 scope link > >            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > >     4: enp59s0f4d1: mtu 9000 qdisc mq state UP group default > qlen 1000 > >         link/ether 00:07:43:18:82:78 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > >         inet6 fe80::207:43ff:fe18:8278/64 scope link > >            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > >     5: eno2: mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000 > >         link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > >         altname enp24s0f1 > >     6: ibp94s0: mtu 2044 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 256 > >         link/infiniband 80:00:0a:08:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:2c:14:51 brd > >     00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff > >     7: ibp94s0d1: mtu 2044 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 256 > >         link/infiniband 80:00:0a:09:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:2c:14:52 brd > >     00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff > >     8: vmbr1224: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default > >     qlen 1000 > >         link/ether a4:bf:01:2f:63:f2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > >         inet 10.224.203.1/16 > scope global vmbr1224 > >            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > >         inet6 fe80::a6bf:1ff:fe2f:63f2/64 scope link > >            valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > > > > >     My current /etc/network/interfaces, which is missing the bridges for the VMs: > >     auto lo > >     iface lo inet loopback > > > >     auto eno1 > >     iface eno1 inet manual > > > >     auto enp59s0f4 > >     iface enp59s0f4 inet manual > >       mtu 9000 > > > >     auto enp59s0f4d1 > >     iface enp59s0f4d1 inet manual > >       mtu 9000 > > > >     auto bond0 > >     iface bond0 inet manual > >       slaves enp59s0f4 enp59s0f4d1 > >       bond-downdelay 200 > >       bond-miimon 100 > >       bond-mode 802.3ad > >       bond-updelay 200 > > > >     auto vmbr1224 > >     iface vmbr1224 inet static > >       address 10.224.203.1 > >       netmask 255.255.0.0 > >       gateway 10.224.200.1 > >       bridge_ports eno1 > >       bridge_stp off > >       bridge_fd 0 > > > >     ##  # VLAN 155 nativ on bond0 > >     ##  auto vmbr155 > >     ##  iface vmbr155 inet manual > >     ##    mtu 9000 > >     ##    bridge_ports bond0 > >     ##    bridge_stp off > >     ##    bridge_fd 0 > > > > > >     This config was copied over from the PVE 6 installation on the same host which experienced > a SSD > >     failure and thus was re-installed with PVE 7. > > > > > >     Am I missing something? Am I being blind? > > > > > >     Any help is appreciated. > > > > > >     Thanks, > > > >             Uwe > > > > > > > > > >     _______________________________________________ > >     pve-user mailing list > >     pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > > > >     https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > > >      > > > >