From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 740D499FCC for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 01:24:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5358CDAD3 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 01:24:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oi1-x235.google.com (mail-oi1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 01:24:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi1-x235.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3ae214a077cso239503b6e.0 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:24:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697066665; x=1697671465; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kBnD4OwrJ1etxYpk8cLt+h4H92U5i4x5qE1IQJn7Gy8=; b=bK4iq1MRM57RI84gk/ujlsu7kxQL1dJTf8qBjuU/JBynpvf2a3BcN9QeTE2pzo7/fM ODwGNibD0E3HqtY0+V/mMkrO7e9AtGXY3rxCDew5ONT4+yj7J14ymmDwwF64DqjBfHUe BApWoY64o+CjzjCVXdU8YvJ6SlPyck2O67Xwi1mjLOVwCYlspWYOxIA8+r4JWajCflXN rLtFTGCyGsKxKkBSs8v/LQgQnq6qTvIonQCosmhTHZnIHZap2Ndfmhfdw6wteZ0UzPhW pVL8/jQFHVd+ZnfAgIFb1IlwwNLhe75eWYm3fPC23620OlFreN2dZWoRK8N2QCqYrCmR //vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697066665; x=1697671465; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kBnD4OwrJ1etxYpk8cLt+h4H92U5i4x5qE1IQJn7Gy8=; b=bZUHeUKTihwKw+sJe3JbtyASE0iA4TH+yd2U1XR4dUtOkRV+4aycxMITuAQGsAjMiz 8PtTpMpzMEp/ySaSINcLd7olSYtmmhPOVhYk1wRRZKBKIs43iM5HhTxZjPx6pK5V9LhO iWcFEcV1RMDWmL880YlB1iBuB8/yeOIiLUbWIi0av0z9J1Fed3lY2GUeDuNcWP9/755U n/Ez4ZeqPRbs5rN/u3vsHD0W5bHcJo8So7cLW1EvGTDDBIn6s40Xt6zNX3N6zHcF673J R2DMI9m7nSvNvWp5oLSzxmuC09AHf6vA6iTiNmsDSjlRjZamHeZRnEkN1BU72mpTkqc2 f2qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw/9LULny4YwexS4lKMvsDELXbK5OEVIJSH+kPRVqUMWEG6nbDS QnyLCFv9wRPKErWxv5nFLYoRJPVrGbRv2A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGjTqA1A7hwgfRYusmWItXv6mOG5rF+pn04ExN0ifHnJcp7iyXml2ax+lOybEEvqxc3EWaNsg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:8a2:b0:14b:86a3:b3f0 with SMTP id m34-20020a05635808a200b0014b86a3b3f0mr25421390rwj.5.1697066665185; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (167-179-176-9.a7b3b0.bne.nbn.aussiebb.net. [167.179.176.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u5-20020aa78385000000b0068c90e1ec84sm10657131pfm.167.2023.10.11.16.24.23 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3c6c92b8-12ed-47c9-a0ed-dc4301244176@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 09:24:21 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <556ivj-6jk.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it> From: Lindsay Mathieson In-Reply-To: <556ivj-6jk.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.566 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider PLING_QUERY 0.1 Subject has exclamation mark and question mark RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Missing firmware?! X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:24:35 -0000 apt-get update && apt-get install firmware-linux-nonfree On 11/10/2023 7:23 pm, Marco Gaiarin wrote: > I've upgraded kernel on some PVE7 installation and: > > Configurazione di pve-kernel-5.15.126-1-pve (5.15.126-1)... > Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d. > run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal 5.15.126-1-pve /boot/vmlinuz-5.15.126-1-pve > run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 5.15.126-1-pve /boot/vmlinuz-5.15.126-1-pve > update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.15.126-1-pve > W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/tigon/tg357766.bin for module tg3 > > I've quickly looked at installed files and effectively firmware seems > missing: > > root@beppe:~# find / -name tg357766.bin > root@beppe:~# grep tg357766.bin /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.list > > > I've not rebooted the server. I have to be afraid? Thanks. > -- Lindsay Mathieson