From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72314814AE for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:38:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2BF2C2C612 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:37:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id C3DA6271CE for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:37:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id u18so39042674wrg.5 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 05:37:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HW9ARiFE/VbTobmVBr7TkHCrkEoSacZXc1U9tjK7+oI=; b=bEgZluMSD+g3gVSpQaTxDjWSBgYI70am5q2qGYdY1BKNd/CVhcViNE0p0jz4241h6n kN/J7KjEuL9xtQ3G+zcZ5IFhTedgkKD0ZKkVLeeZwHdT/2NUjmH0O/xeCVmmJRnVUtcT 9uz/HSOf4Y7D8oRrQM/D3yrcr3Iq8Tw8r2ohgfM1bI9YFXzrw6ooQiJ5468nOho+aAoX nRQ9UbXq3DVE5xAopkU8iESe0XQ7wjlfdPH8JQ3BUUxKBq3sguc/NgJ7H5G5aS3GgX3K bD3xbRn5+FRh9lErRyou6VwZGxzF1MwAq5uXybyS/njVfW1hW4ShRhjbeaojXK/eXEQv kN3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to :subject:content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HW9ARiFE/VbTobmVBr7TkHCrkEoSacZXc1U9tjK7+oI=; b=agpimISLEkD5KQX19QjjvsOa6BJ/c7p3yLfH/8hx1ZmHqWm3uLZTAJs8iJBJue+zU1 r8ESt+cSmXB8y9mnX5iIl6sqPlQ0FiBxsqVXfvq/QJgFdp6y7jMlh4YJsO8xSur6E0S8 Cw3BsbmcPgkcYTmfOGz0WkQyQJ0USvNu4QZQ2ieOnD8C6sLFAXU7caAYlkaQq+x/5x9C mCcpRtUmKouxLCRMdz0g6sxKQM/G+OeyzPZxb1TvnYjSIp8VyPt4kWcs+LMRUA74ZBo1 gHEnQUsNeQeE3MurvBx46owhb2KaWbOYdhRw2r4lDWGPipKigr5swBFyJO6kQelcS6iG x8Rg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532f7uFyZtTDHV+34N4sA8rYkg+2dAsj2EKIyQ6sdFtEqENH9LVQ Hnj2GaRUslS63hwzOUftjGRtUas3TrU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMAO2a9jlobP/cM4Ry7rMJUc5Vxrs3f5ceQcGCl4VEQNwGP65WjsToHD0HkUKwSgzgU2X0RA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:514a:: with SMTP id u10mr7236231wrt.321.1637674628541; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 05:37:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:8070:a2a8:1a00:5605:dbff:fe76:161d? ([2a02:8070:a2a8:1a00:5605:dbff:fe76:161d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f7sm1614981wmg.6.2021.11.23.05.37.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 05:37:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <37bf83e6-a9f8-fa22-ae56-b9e704ea5003@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:37:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com Content-Language: de-DE To: Ralf Storm , Proxmox VE user list References: <8d0421f8-9c29-ddd4-fce2-068a2e9981c5@konzept-is.de> <737e7b21-85e0-f7a8-9dff-a6e0a3470951@konzept-is.de> From: Uwe Sauter In-Reply-To: <737e7b21-85e0-f7a8-9dff-a6e0a3470951@konzept-is.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.828 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -0.097 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] OS Error after upgrade to 7.1 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 13:38:25 -0000 Am 23.11.21 um 14:34 schrieb Ralf Storm: > Hello, > > > yes - I have a problem, as mentioned in my first mail, the system is stuck at boot with this message > and then after a few minutes reboots... Can you reboot with the previous kernel and check the firmware of the controller? dmesg | grep mpt | grep -i fw should show the firmware version. > > > Am 23/11/2021 um 14:14 schrieb Uwe Sauter: >> Am 23.11.21 um 14:04 schrieb Ralf Storm: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I´m currently upgrading my 7-node Cluster, 1 node without problems, 2 nodes had renamed NICs to be >>> corrected, >>> >>> but the last Node stucks at boot with this message: "mpt2sas_cm0: overiding NVDATA EEDPTagMode >>> setting" >>> >>> Anybody had this error before? >> Yes, unrelated to Proxmox. But the SAS controller works fine even with this message. >> >> Do you have issues accessing your storage? >> >>> Best regards >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >