From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EADF58177B for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:37:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D888121F21 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:36:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2E8E521F12 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:36:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id o19-20020a1c7513000000b0033a93202467so2429673wmc.2 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 07:36:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DU0SFkgQV83mvQB5tpx9rAAAL95ZLGJTHEfyz4MBfYI=; b=PIPRugmDv93a/uXIyIHiOLdZ25RiiZGWVo1tKkbgJna9Goudb8w+FpNnZr3/3xvCHU 0fKDGCuU2ydgLYt/fWql6fySYwVPH8qIppBm89dLakWji3VlZG6oEOoWDTCeiL4G0uSN W/jEDgVHHsch+LTNFMZquwopk5V3ERraKehKxlsLNJJOMcXaHcXemDWqF1Q/nxWNxQYG LN6mI9ogxc86ORzKsBs7ALkWfa/Zw/xMMCe4tH8ehDVzUxfltNUfxsio6IvAM1hNAs+M jG7njxoggPcTXMhC9x2IY77V19xaSAcPcjNTShihvxtmZQjDjouylPzi3u7qG9MqrlGc jAjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:reply-to :subject:content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DU0SFkgQV83mvQB5tpx9rAAAL95ZLGJTHEfyz4MBfYI=; b=1A61L21+VKeKbybtqcNt/3ibaOTCgdYl8OoMvvU0og9P96IHdR/7RF6VUs5d1BbIOO 8r5KBcPRDVSlwcSCjPUBdaQKKfdOLmpQKaW01EEh1y6iwUgxYxVBRA+oRmxanoAgpMYY fKEMbraAKK1KrrTG13XcBW7sSQk8V3xBYxmu851iipWFdb8hNWpQoZB14buHGKT3xwCw wo5898w3hGVtWusYhbdasSSyO9/oZOJK0swso+jQEtFA1FQCBrAH1zvXyyqKu0z3Hx3I 8XD5ORwxLvUWzR51lAV4UOQN8kk6RGxo63A5ZzGrXNcmLQcBzUPEldbQECx5YGxtm54r s2uA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533oXfxcgpz2lWte1Ny1bYr8fVI5tAz0npTc1CQt45HFDAdG/Xqx gpnoC77Mh73lMXwW9Q2rqjz+RyntprU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5byUb6cPtPreK6MAvsmfhdWuxNg7Ty6/uXJT6kMrm6/BwWXx9vR2oViRaIa2AvTLXCyLy3g== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4d15:: with SMTP id o21mr16103654wmh.171.1637768201718; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 07:36:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:8070:a2a8:1a00:5605:dbff:fe76:161d? ([2a02:8070:a2a8:1a00:5605:dbff:fe76:161d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p12sm159343wro.33.2021.11.24.07.36.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 07:36:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3781af86-dd35-4a35-0287-9514ef0e81be@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:36:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com Content-Language: de-DE To: Proxmox VE user list , Ralf Storm References: <8d0421f8-9c29-ddd4-fce2-068a2e9981c5@konzept-is.de> <737e7b21-85e0-f7a8-9dff-a6e0a3470951@konzept-is.de> <37bf83e6-a9f8-fa22-ae56-b9e704ea5003@gmail.com> <801379f0-658e-ee56-770f-86df05eeed76@konzept-is.de> From: Uwe Sauter In-Reply-To: <801379f0-658e-ee56-770f-86df05eeed76@konzept-is.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.646 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -3.515 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] OS Error after upgrade to 7.1 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:37:20 -0000 Am 24.11.21 um 15:45 schrieb Ralf Storm: > Hello Stefan, > > I had the old Firmware (from2015?) 000..26 - the ri version not the it version - this did not work > on the 5.13 Kernel - stuck at boot and server rebooting after a while > > the newest version i found was from 2016 000..27 , which works, it is hard to find any firmwares as > the vendor does not supply it anymore, there are descriptions howto update and links to the > firmware, but the links are dead... > If you go to https://www.broadcom.com/support/download-search and then: Product Group -> Legacy Products (all the way down) Product Family -> Legacy Host Bus Adapters Product Name -> SAS 9211-8i Host Bus Adapter => Search you will find all firmware versions and related tools, docs, etc. that Broadcom shares. The latest available firmware is 20.00.07.00 dated 2016-04-04. > Has to be updated in efi shell from usb drive > > > hope that helps, > > best regards > > Ralf > > > Hi Ralf > > Would you mind to share the old and new firmware versions of your controller and your kernel version? > > It might help other PVE users to avoid the problem you have run into. > > Thank you > > Stefan > >> On Nov 24, 2021, at 11:24, Ralf Storm  wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> Proxmox is starting again after upgrading the firmware of the 9211-8i controllers... >> >> And yes it did boot with the old Kernel, so the Firmware of the controllers was incompatible with >> thie new Kernel. >> >> >> Ralf Storm >> >> >> Systemadministrator >> >> >> >> Konzept Informationssysteme GmbH >> >> Am 23.11.2021 um 14:37 schrieb Uwe Sauter: >>> Am 23.11.21 um 14:34 schrieb Ralf Storm: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> >>>> yes - I have a problem, as mentioned in my first mail, the system is stuck at boot with this >>>> message >>>> and then after a few minutes reboots... >>> Can you reboot with the previous kernel and check the firmware of the controller? >>> >>> dmesg | grep mpt | grep -i fw >>> >>> should show the firmware version. >>> >>> >>>> Am 23/11/2021 um 14:14 schrieb Uwe Sauter: >>>>> Am 23.11.21 um 14:04 schrieb Ralf Storm: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I´m currently upgrading my 7-node Cluster, 1 node without problems, 2 nodes had renamed NICs >>>>>> to be >>>>>> corrected, >>>>>> >>>>>> but the last Node stucks at boot with this message: "mpt2sas_cm0: overiding NVDATA EEDPTagMode >>>>>> setting" >>>>>> >>>>>> Anybody had this error before? >>>>> Yes, unrelated to Proxmox. But the SAS controller works fine even with this message. >>>>> >>>>> Do you have issues accessing your storage? >>>>> >>>>>> Best regards >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> pve-user mailing list >>>>> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >>>>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user