From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 627A59B64A
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 25 May 2023 09:43:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3CB1A275A4
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 25 May 2023 09:43:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 25 May 2023 09:43:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7AF734706D
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 25 May 2023 09:43:15 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <374604f3-c28b-5ed4-0d58-c1bcc6473c05@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 09:43:15 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <mailman.190.1684933430.348.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 <c75cc8dc-3f50-f69a-8db2-ecd1b45e4715@proxmox.com>
 <a1b75fe0ead447f2b1679685c4018337716c5e27.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <a1b75fe0ead447f2b1679685c4018337716c5e27.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.015 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] vGPU scheduling
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 07:43:46 -0000

On 5/25/23 09:32, DERUMIER, Alexandre wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
> 
> any news about your patches "add cluster-wide hardware device mapping"

i'm currently on a new version of this
first part was my recent series for the section config/api array support

i think i can send the new version for the backend this week

> ?
> 
> Do you think it'll be merged for proxmox 8 ?

i don't know, but this also depends on the capacity of my colleagues to review ;)

> 
> I think it could help for this usecase.
> 

yes i think so too, but it was not directly connected to the request so
i did not mention it