From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D966F84975 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:09:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CF801942B for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:09:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D2211941E for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 18:09:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id v15-20020a9d604f000000b0056cdb373b82so21586110otj.7 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:09:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wolfspyre-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GIPfek/Xg0qTZq7Vm81Wiruk7sXJ1Rt6nfhE0MFe2bw=; b=n9LhBa1wp6WWD5Pu1vDE9sWTOfBFueLCjaLOsriJEtY3ynIA+2YJ1lPcXpzk/fbS6m 5WcrYA/9z1oS2V887M5oQ6Xzu9irZxpqtOxIyU7og8VemWZoqGBk3nwYW0VewD/EYQoJ U4KjUpyxFrXDt67FlTgppYK1rE/5PLkiOz/rHTD9H6RPtTMncPgDATOzohOf5LPueiM2 s/YokZWyIo08M84XzwRPdBb91QhRxuDZHzg/PfbluTwgYQPGLoA6b8DCwv4QebeW1rsd PtBH00dfCwpDaj/OP7M8kFQpPVu0FFzYc2b0pjtykyhlTZxvy/0QcrGBnG3a+M55Rtid R8cw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GIPfek/Xg0qTZq7Vm81Wiruk7sXJ1Rt6nfhE0MFe2bw=; b=r1cBYjxxPFnqgHmMKHdkYU45hnkfrb3oQgdTsUAbR/NoMDN4fT5s3mfynWQ3R0NQ5f HySC2hHvA0udCWeT/gkNBkldb6s9ZihWsEAhChLOY5+6QLQ2L+g8xY7fCepQGk2uuSrV RpDpc8gVFZe1sxUV1jENa3SDhKlPA8ZhD/WTudp9tO7F5nQZivufm+Zan62ld9lG0JDw C0a0b3JC3AQjAibPKPuPfjDbocvDID/tRENa9nMoKa70WpmMoQyLVf80Z0YMOhKXQ2bQ BEZYiCDxwaXgG/xVCNEmLOFm5eHNmeFr7PeE1croWFfNPUe4Fwl0Ut8Alo7CnZbvjEfN XxIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ZsPaLdClagYtrR9oCI0DiMLP0lqfjSztoBuruZ7bfHQpurnZ2 yhOUzDcWGi8py1ouBydnFO2/Wg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZuosSdsaunEra6orNtcMoOMlDyd3g9kJ0+IRX7HnRyRT5CXC+JehS8zVl1svSKjqCbpS5pA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1397:: with SMTP id d23mr5181562otq.68.1639501743811; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:09:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple (108-221-46-27.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [108.221.46.27]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u28sm57750otj.57.2021.12.14.09.09.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:09:03 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\)) From: Wolf Noble In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 11:09:02 -0600 Cc: Proxmox VE user list Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <368D002A-68CA-44FC-BB27-CFC0A201B799@wolfspyre.com> References: <13B8A60E-E410-4293-997A-A6BF5ED36CC4@wolfspyre.com> To: Aaron Lauterer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.40.0.1.81) X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [ceph.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ceph metrics emitted from metrics endpoint? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:09:14 -0000 Hi Aaron! Sure! Totally a legit way to go... I was thinking that since there is already a metric endpoint = configuration mechanism in proxmox, being able to also optionally emit = ceph metrics to the same endpoint in an elegant fashion might be = attractive through the lens of streamlining converged footprint metrics. I'd gotten the sense that it's mildly discouraged to go mucking with the = underlying daemon configs of ceph, as one might get their fingers caught = in the cookie jar during upgrades n wotnot, so thought it worthwhile to = ask here first. Thanks for the tip! W =E2=9D=A4=EF=B8=8F=F0=9F=90=BA Wolf Noble Hoof & Paw wolf@wolfspyre.com [=3D The contents of this message have been written, read, processed, = erased, sorted, sniffed, compressed, rewritten, misspelled, = overcompensated, lost, found, and most importantly delivered entirely = with recycled electrons =3D] >=20 > On Dec 14, 2021, at 2:07 AM, Aaron Lauterer = wrote: >=20 > The Ceph Manager can integrate with quite a few external monitoring = tools itself [0]. Graphite does not seem to be there, but InfluxDB, = Prometheus, Zabbix, ... are all there. > That would be the direct way, and hopefully something is already there = that is helpful to you. >=20 > Since the MGR does not seem to support Graphite out of the box, that's = where your posted link to ceph-collectd-graphite might be handy, though = I have no experience with it. >=20 > Cheers, > Aaron >=20 > [0] https://docs.ceph.com/en/pacific/mgr/ >=20