From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5268E94622 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:52:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 329AF20991 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:52:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.iper.net (mail.iper.net [94.236.32.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:52:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from servercsa.csaricerche.com (UnknownHost [82.134.223.122]) by mail.iper.net with SMTP (version=TLS\Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:51:36 +0100 Received: from [192.168.70.10] (psala-lx2.csaricerche.com [192.168.70.10]) (Authenticated sender: psala) by servercsa.csaricerche.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EEDD20134394 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:51:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <30f4b6af-71b9-ee09-c48e-e78101a95cfa@riminilug.it> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:51:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Content-Language: it, en-US To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <7606f44a-279c-c797-8206-95ea281245b1@riminilug.it> <1e2cc9a1-5673-33de-fff6-cf8d601d3806@riminilug.it> From: Piviul In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 20.00]; IP_WHITELIST(0.00)[192.168.70.10] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=multimap; Matched map: IP_WHITELIST X-Rspamd-Server: servercsa.csaricerche.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0EEDD20134394 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.196 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_NONE 0.25 DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has no DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_SOFTFAIL 0.665 SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ceph X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:52:06 -0000 On 1/11/23 14:46, Eneko Lacunza via pve-user wrote: > Hi, > > El 11/1/23 a las 12:19, Piviul escribió: >> On 1/11/23 10:39, Eneko Lacunza via pve-user wrote: >>> You should change your public_network to 192.168.255.0/24 . >> >> So the public_network is the pve communication network? I can edit >> directly the /etc/pve/ceph.conf and then corosync should change the >> ceph.conf on the others nodes? > > Sorry, I misread your info: > >> $ ip route >> default via 192.168.64.1 dev vmbr0 proto kernel onlink >> 192.168.64.0/20 dev vmbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.70.30 >> 192.168.254.0/24 dev vmbr2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.254.1 >> 192.168.255.0/24 dev vmbr1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.255.1 >> >> vmbr2 is the CEPH network, vmbr1 is the PVE network and vmbr0 is the >> LAN network. So you suggest me to add first the 3 ceph monitors using >> the CEPH IPs network and then destroy the 3 monitors having LAN IPs? > > You should set it to 192.168.254.0/24, as that's your ceph net. many thanks Eneko, so in ceph.conf I have to set the cluster_network and public_network to the same subnet? Furtermore a last question... to change the content of ceph.conf I can edit it in one of the pve nodes? Piviul